<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://halachipedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yonatanf89</id>
	<title>Halachipedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://halachipedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yonatanf89"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Yonatanf89"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T17:44:00Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23511</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23511"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:43:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Buying Meat From Non-Jews */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buying Meat From Non-Jews==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Rabbis established that it is not permitted to (buy and) eat any meat that a non-Jew has in their possession, even if all the meat stores and slaughterhouses in the area are Kosher. This is even true if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat from a Jew, because of [[Basar Shenitalem Min Haayin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:5, Chochmat Adam Klal 27:12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there are some that disagree with the last point, and believe that if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat originally from a Jew, then it is okay to (buy and) eat, if there was no way for the non-Jew to switch the meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see the Shach Y.D. 118:5 who quotes the Levush who is Meikil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is okay to buy (Kosher) meat from a non-Jewish vendor if the vendor makes sure to sell them with the proper double-seal from the Jewish distributors, given that the type of double-seal is well-known.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein explains that if the storeowner switched the meat and forged the double-seal of the Kosher butcher, then he would miss out on selling the pieces of Kosher meat for a more expensive price.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23510</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23510"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:41:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Buying Meat From Non-Jews */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buying Meat From Non-Jews==&lt;br /&gt;
#The Rabbis established that it is not permitted to (buy and) eat any meat that a non-Jew has in their possession, even if all the meat stores and slaughterhouses in the area are Kosher. This is even true if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat from a Jew, because of Basar Shenitalem Min Haayin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:5, Chochmat Adam Klal 27:12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there are some that disagree with the last point, and believe that if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat originally from a Jew, then it is okay to (buy and) eat, if there was no way for the non-Jew to switch the meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see the Shach Y.D. 118:5 who quotes the Levush who is Meikil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is okay to buy (Kosher) meat from a non-Jewish vendor if the vendor makes sure to sell them with the proper double-seal from the Jewish distributors, given that the type of double-seal is well-known.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein explains that if the storeowner switched the meat and forged the double-seal of the Kosher butcher, then he would miss out on selling the pieces of Kosher meat for a more expensive price.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23509</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23509"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:41:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Nowadays */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buying Meat From Non-Jews===&lt;br /&gt;
#The Rabbis established that it is not permitted to (buy and) eat any meat that a non-Jew has in their possession, even if all the meat stores and slaughterhouses in the area are Kosher. This is even true if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat from a Jew, because of Basar Shenitalem Min Haayin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:5, Chochmat Adam Klal 27:12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there are some that disagree with the last point, and believe that if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat originally from a Jew, then it is okay to (buy and) eat, if there was no way for the non-Jew to switch the meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see the Shach Y.D. 118:5 who quotes the Levush who is Meikil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is okay to buy (Kosher) meat from a non-Jewish vendor if the vendor makes sure to sell them with the proper double-seal from the Jewish distributors, given that the type of double-seal is well-known.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein explains that if the storeowner switched the meat and forged the double-seal of the Kosher butcher, then he would miss out on selling the pieces of Kosher meat for a more expensive price.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23508</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23508"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:41:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buying Meat From Non-Jews&lt;br /&gt;
#The Rabbis established that it is not permitted to (buy and) eat any meat that a non-Jew has in their possession, even if all the meat stores and slaughterhouses in the area are Kosher. This is even true if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat from a Jew, because of Basar Shenitalem Min Haayin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:5, Chochmat Adam Klal 27:12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there are some that disagree with the last point, and believe that if it is known that the non-Jew bought the meat originally from a Jew, then it is okay to (buy and) eat, if there was no way for the non-Jew to switch the meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see the Shach Y.D. 118:5 who quotes the Levush who is Meikil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is okay to buy (Kosher) meat from a non-Jewish vendor if the vendor makes sure to sell them with the proper double-seal from the Jewish distributors, given that the type of double-seal is well-known.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein explains that if the storeowner switched the meat and forged the double-seal of the Kosher butcher, then he would miss out on selling the pieces of Kosher meat for a more expensive price.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggrot Moshe Y.D. 1:56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23507</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23507"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:35:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* How Many Seals are Needed? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
#Ashkenazim hold that after the fact, only one seal is needed if the food was delivered by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tosfot Avoda Zara 31a s.v. damar quotes Rabbenu Tam as holding that for a non-Jew one seal is sufficient two seals are only necessary for a non-religious Jew. Ramban Avoda Zara 31a s.v. umafteach and Rashba 31a s.v. echad disagree with Rabbenu Tam. Ramban argues that the Rif and Bahag agree with him. Meiri 31a implies that the majority don&#039;t follow Rabbenu Tam. Nemukei Yosef Avoda Zara 31a cites Rabbenu Tam. Raah 31a distinguishes between food left in the property of a non-Jew that requires two seals but not if it is in the property of a Jew. Rama 118:1 follows the Rabbenu Tam after the fact based on the Iser Vheter 22:11. However, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1 rejects the opinion of Rabbenu Tam. Kaf Hachaim 118:21 writes that Rabbenu Tam isn&#039;t accepted even for a major loss but it could be used for a factor to be lenient together with other reasons.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Signing With Two Letters ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# It is considered two seals if a Jew signs or writes two letters across the closures of a package.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ran Avoda Zara 11a, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Locks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# A seal and a lock is like two seals, but one lock isn&#039;t even like one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ran Avodah Zara 11a, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some authorities recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Nails on Wooden or Metal Boxes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If you get food delivered in a wooden or metal box, and the cover is attached with nails- that is considered a seal, because it is very hard to open that type of closure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some authorities maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some authorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23506</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23506"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:35:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Packaging for Delivery */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23501</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23501"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:24:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* How Many Seals are Needed? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some authorities recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Nails on Wooden or Metal Boxes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If you get food delivered in a wooden or metal box, and the cover is attached with nails- that is considered a seal, because it is very hard to open that type of closure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some authorities maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some authorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23495</id>
		<title>Non-Jewish Food Vendors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Non-Jewish_Food_Vendors&amp;diff=23495"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:14:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Packaging for Delivery */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kosher Tape.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#From the Torah law, any time a piece of meat is found and one is unsure whether it is kosher or not, one may rely on majority. If majority of the butchers in town sell kosher meat, then one may presume that it is kosher. However, the Rabbis forbid any piece of meat that wasn&#039;t kept in sight of a Jew except in certain cases. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a piece of kosher meat left one&#039;s eyesight it is presumed to be non-kosher unless it has a unique identifying mark, one recognizes its look and one is certain that it is the same piece of meat, or it was wrapped and sealed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch YD 63:1, Yalkut Yosef YD 63:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nowadays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Ashkenazic minhag is that anytime one leaves a piece of meat and finds it in the same place that one left it, it is presumed to be kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama YD 63:2 writes that the minhag is to assume that as long as the piece of meat is in the same place as it was earlier, it is the same piece of kosher meat. Be&#039;er Heitiv YD 63:6 cites a dispute between the Shach who follows the Rama and the Taz who is even more lenient. Aruch HaShulchan YD 63:9 also rules like the Rama.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#For Sephardim, if one left meat in one&#039;s house and one&#039;s windows are closed so that birds can&#039;t come in, or if the meat was covered and remained covered, it is kosher. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef YD 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Packaging for Delivery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, fish, and uncooked wine need two seals if sent with a non-Jew. Cooked wine, milk, cheese, bread, or anything that is only of rabbinic concern only needs one seal if sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemara Avoda Zara 39a records the distinction of Rav between meat, fish, wine, and techelet which need two seals as opposed to milk, cheese, and bread which only need one. Rashi 39b s.v. asurin explains that the first category are expensive things and there&#039;s a higher concern that the non-Jew switched them. Rashba (Torat Habayit Haaruch 28a) explains that Rav&#039;s distinction depended on whether the food was of Biblical concern or rabbinic. Finally, the Ran Avoda Zara 16a s.v. chavit says that if there was a concern that the food itself would be non-kosher two seals are necessary but if the concern if only if non-kosher was mixed in or that it is only a rabbinic concern one seal is sufficient. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1 adopts the explanation of the Rashba. Shach 118:3 agrees.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Ashkenazim hold that after the fact anything sent by a non-Jew only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tosfot Avoda Zara 31a s.v. damar quotes Rabbenu Tam as holding that for a non-Jew one seal is sufficient two seals are only necessary for a non-religious Jew. Ramban Avoda Zara 31a s.v. umafteach and Rashba 31a s.v. echad disagree with Rabbenu Tam. Ramban argues that the Rif and Bahag agree with him. Meiri 31a implies that the majority don&#039;t follow Rabbenu Tam. Nemukei Yosef Avoda Zara 31a cites Rabbenu Tam. Raah 31a distinguishes between food left in the property of a non-Jew that requires two seals but not if it is in the property of a Jew. Rama 118:1 follows the Rabbenu Tam after the fact based on the Iser Vheter 22:11. However, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1 rejects the opinion of Rabbenu Tam. Kaf Hachaim 118:21 writes that Rabbenu Tam isn&#039;t accepted even for a major loss but it could be used for a factor to be lenient together with other reasons.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Putting two letters across the seal of a package is sufficient to classify as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ran Avoda Zara 11a, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A seal and a lock is like two seals, but one lock isn&#039;t even like one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ran Avoda Zara 11a, Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hired Delivery Man===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a delivery man, non-Jewish or Jewish but not religious, is hired by a store he can be trusted to honestly delivery the food and not switch the food since he is afraid of loosing his job if he were found to be switching the food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shevet Hakehati 3:228 quoting Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, Yalkut YosefIsur Vheter v. 1 p. 139&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Some rishonim hold that only a delivery needs two seals but if someone left kosher food with a non-Jew one seal is sufficient. After the fact this opinion can be relied upon for a great loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tosfot Avoda Zara 31a s.v. damar write that one seal is enough if someone left kosher food with a non-Jew and turns to find it the same as he left it. Ran Avoda Zara 11a favors the opinion of Tosfot but he notes that the Rif, Rambam, and Bahag disagree with this approach. Pri Chadash 118:14 accepts Tosfot as primary. Shulchan Aruch 118:1 quotes the majority opinion as anonymous and Tosfot as an individual opinion. Kaf Hachaim 118:17 writes that for a great loss we could rely on Tosfot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Kosher Pots Left with a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#A person shouldn&#039;t leave kosher pots with a non-Jew otherwise there is a concern that they used the kosher pots for non-kosher food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch and Rama Y.D. 122:9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To avoid this issue one could either &lt;br /&gt;
##leave for less than 18 minutes or not let the non-Jew know that you are leaving for more than 18 minutes and they think you might return at any moment,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 122:9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##designate pots for the non-Jew so that they can use their own pots and won&#039;t have to use the kosher pots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tosfot Avoda Zara 12a s.v. vshadi writes that we&#039;re not concerned that the non-Jew will intentionally take something from a Jew unless he stands to benefit. Minchat Asher YD 2:51 s.v. vnireh writes if a non-Jew has pots designated for them we can assume that they used those and there&#039;s no concern that they used the kosher pots that they were not supposed to use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact if one left one&#039;s kosher pots with a non-Jew such as with a maid for more than 18 minutes the kosher might have been made non-Kosher. As such one shouldn&#039;t use them for 24 hours but afterwards one can use them without kashering them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama 122:9, Igrot Moshe 1:61&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other poskim hold that after the fact the pots can be used immediately.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Asher YD 2:51&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23494</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23494"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:12:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Using Nails */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some authorities recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Nails on Wooden or Metal Boxes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# If you get food delivered in a wooden or metal box, and the cover is attached with nails- that is considered a seal, because it is very hard to open that type of closure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some authorities maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some authorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23493</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23493"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:10:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Using Nails */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some authorities recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Nails===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# If you get food delivered in a wooden or metal box, and the cover is attached with nails- that is considered a seal, because it is very hard to open that type of closure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some authorities maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some authorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23491</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23491"/>
		<updated>2019-07-16T00:08:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Types of Effective Seals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Nails===&lt;br /&gt;
If you get food delivered in a wooden or metal box, and the cover is attached with nails- that is considered a seal, because it is very hard to open that type of closure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23430</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23430"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T01:47:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#In places where the Jews eat bread made by non-Jews, then some say it is permitted to eat bread sent to you through a non-Jewish delivery-man with no seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some disagree with that position.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Chadash Y.D. 118:9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the bread in questions seems to have things inside it which are not permitted to eat if they were delivered to you by a non-Jewish delivery man, then the appropriate number of seals are required according to everyone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23427</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23427"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T01:44:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#After the fact, you can eat butter delivered to you by a non-Jewish messenger even if it doesn&#039;t have any seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14, quoting the Taz Y.D. 127:7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, if there is a reason to expect that there are problems more severe with the butter than just ‘Milk of a non-Jew,’ then the butter must have a seal for it to maintain its Kashrut when it is sent with a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Teshuvot Mahari HaLevi Y.D. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23424</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23424"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T01:41:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#If the shape of the slices of meat are distinguishable due to a specially shaped cut or a there is a special string strung through the meat which you know as a sign of Kashrut, then you can eat such meat when it is delivered to you by a non-Jew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a non-Jew delivered you several pieces of meat and some had Kosher-signs and some did not, if there is reason to think that some were switched then the ones without Kosher-signs are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama Y.D. 118:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This would be true even if all the pieces of meat in question were in a bag together with a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:64&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you got a piece of thigh meat delivered by a non-Jew, and it is cut in such a way that makes it clear that only a Jewish butcher could have slaughtered this piece of meat (because the sciatic nerve is removed seamlessly) then no seal is needed, because this is an absolute sign of Kosher meat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pri Toar Y.D. 188:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Consider a case where someone sent a bird with a non-Jewish messenger to get slaughtered in a Kosher way. If the delivery person comes back with a slaughtered bird, it is okay to eat if you can identify something unique about the bird which assures you that this bird was yours previously.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Minchat Yaakov Klal 32:40, cited in Bein Yisrael LNachri 17:10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If, however, you send the non-Jew with money for the Shechita, or the place of Shechitta is very far away, then it is not okay to eat the bird that he the delivery person comes back with, as he would have great motivation to slaughter the animal himself, pocket the money, and avoid the long travels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach Y.D. 118:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23413</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23413"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T01:10:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Wine Delivered by a non-Jew */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23412</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23412"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T01:09:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Medieval Rabbis about how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, there is a disagreement about whether wine would require one seal or two.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some poskim maintain that nowadays everyone would agree that wine always only needs one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taz Y.D. 118:4 and Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24. The reasoning is that non-Jews are not suspected to be idol worshipers nowadays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you want to send cooked wine or wine which is flavored with honey or another similar additive, then perhaps you will only need one seal, as the wine is extra identifiable. However, some suggest that this leniency would only apply if the delivery person is informed about the uniqueness of the wine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 123:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the delivery person is not aware of the uniqueness of the wine, then there would not be any additional factors in this situation which would inhibit the delivery person from tampering with the wine. However, after the fact, if the non-Jew did not know the state of the wine when they were delivering it, then the wine is still considered Kosher according to some poskim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri 17 note 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23411</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23411"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:58:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* How Many Seals are Needed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23410</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23410"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:58:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Types of Effective Seals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Using Unique Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sealing Bottles Effectively===&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles that are closed strongly with a cork or another type of cap which cannot be opened without a special tool (bottle-openers, corkscrews, etc.) are considered to have one seal. Adding a clay seal on top of the cork would be considered the second seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bottles for drinks that do not need two seals (milk, juice, lemonade, etc.) may be sent with a non-Jew with only a single seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that you can seal a bottle loosely and then fasten a clay seal on top of that in order to render its one seal. However, some poskim recommend being stringent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaf HaChaim Y.D. 118:24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wine Delivered by a non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Meat Products Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Butter Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bread Delivered by a Non-Jew==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23408</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23408"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:46:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Types of Effective Seals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have a unique seal on a package of some kind (which is distinct from the usual way to seal the type of package in question), then adding a knot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or a wax seal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on top of the box is sufficient to establish this package as doubly-sealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23407</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23407"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:43:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Effective Seals==&lt;br /&gt;
===Knots===&lt;br /&gt;
#Two uncommon knots which are tied around a package could be considered two seals, however two regular knots would not count as two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 130:5. The Taz Y.D. 130:8 explains that simple and common knots are too easy to untie and tie again, so there is not a sure enough guarantee that the food has not been tampered with by the delivery person&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say, however, that if the first knot is uncommon, then even if the second knot is common the combination of the two would be considered two seals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Bein Yisrael LNachri Y.D. 17:21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23404</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23404"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:36:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* How Many Seals are Needed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents Kashrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23403</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23403"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:34:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a disagreement among Rishonim how to understand a seeming contradiction in Rav&#039;s opinion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avodah Zarah 31a and Avodah Zarah 39a-b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;regarding the number of seals which are needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbeinu Tam and Rashba on Avodah Zarah 39a say that the distinction is that if one is using a non-Jewish delivery person, then one seal is needed, but if one was using a delivery person who is a Jew who is suspect to eat non-Kosher food, then two seals are needed. Tosfot on Avodah Zarah 39a says that the distinction is that if you are using a non-Jewish messenger, but you can see the product on both sides of his delivery, then only one seal is needed. However, according to Tosfot, if there are different Jewish people on the two ends of the delivery, then two seals are needed. Rambam in Hilchot Maachalot Asurot 13:10, Aruch HaShulchan Y.D. 118:2, and Shach Y.D. 118:3 says that the distinction is about what food products are being sent and what level the concern about their Kashrut reaches. To the Rambam and the others listed here, if the food presents a DiOrayta Kashrut concern, two seals are needed. If, however, the food only presents a DiRabbanan concern, only one seal is needed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch holds that if the food presents KAshrut concerns on a DiOrayta level, then two seals are needed. However, other food would only require one seal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Shulchan Aruch nevertheless cites other opinions which are more stringent when it comes to which situations require two seals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23402</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23402"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:17:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* General */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How Many Seals are Needed==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23401</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23401"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:16:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* General */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
#The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is known as &#039;&#039;Teviyat Ayin&#039;&#039;, defined by [http://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1131/its-a-siman-that-its-kosher-avoiding-bosor-shenisalaim-min-hoayin/ Rabbi Moshe Heineman] from Star-K as, &amp;quot;if a Jew can recognize that this is the original piece of meat or poultry that was previously known to be Kosher, and[it] can be clearly identified without any question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
#This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23397</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23397"/>
		<updated>2019-07-11T00:09:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== General ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
# The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
# In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a Jew being able to identify this object as being exactly the piece of food that they knew to be Kosher previously&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, or, most significantly, &#039;&#039;Tzarur v&#039;Chatum&#039;&#039; - ensuring that the meat or other food is wrapped, packaged or sealed (either once or twice, depending on the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
# This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23389</id>
		<title>Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_Packaging_for_Deliveries&amp;diff=23389"/>
		<updated>2019-07-10T01:47:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: Created page with &amp;quot;== General ==  # Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&amp;#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the na...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== General ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Meat, and, in general, other food that is out of a Jew&#039;s sight for a certain amount of time no longer retains its status as Kosher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, in the name of Rav. Rashi ad. loc explains that the time period in question is an hour. The Ritva ad. loc says that the period of time is actually a relatively short amount of time. S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 63:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This fundamental principle is called [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew|Basar SheNitalem Min Haayin]], and it can be applied to cases when a Jew sends food to another Jew using a non-Jewish delivery person.&lt;br /&gt;
# The concern is rooted in our inability to know the motivations for the non-Jews to possibly switch the Kosher food for non-Kosher equivalents. We thus would prefer the food to be watched by a Jew from the time of its production until its consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
# In order to assuage our need for the food to be as if it is watched constantly, we rely upon either &#039;&#039;Simanim&#039;&#039; (clear symbols)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chullin 95a, see Rashi ad. loc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ....&lt;br /&gt;
# This concern applies to rich delivery persons as well as it does to poor ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRadbaz 4:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Leaving a deposit of food with a non-Jew is considered with the same analysis as cases with a non-Jewish delivery person.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Y.D. 118:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_without_Kosher_Supervision&amp;diff=23387</id>
		<title>Kosher Food without Kosher Supervision</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher_Food_without_Kosher_Supervision&amp;diff=23387"/>
		<updated>2019-07-10T01:33:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: Redirected page to Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Kosher Packaging for Deliveries and Kosher Food Left with a Non-Jew]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kashrut&amp;diff=23386</id>
		<title>Kashrut</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Kashrut&amp;diff=23386"/>
		<updated>2019-07-10T01:31:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;* [[General overview of Kashrut]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bishul Akum]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Checking for Bugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dairy Bread]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Eating Dairy and Meat at the Same Table]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gelatin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glatt Kosher Meat]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grape Juice and Wine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Items That Cannot Be Nullified]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kosher Cheese]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kosher Food without Kosher Supervision]] ([[Basar SheNitalem Min HaAyin]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kosher Food Packaging for Deliveries]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kosher Milk]] ([[Chalav Yisrael]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Koshering a Kitchen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kosher in the Workplace]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Medications]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Milk and Meat in the Kitchen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Non-Dairy Milk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nullification]] (Bitul BeRov)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pas Palter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Selling Non-Kosher Foods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Serving Guests]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sharp Foods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tevilat Keilim|Dipping vessels in the Mikveh]] ([[Tevilat Keilim]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transferring Taste]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tzaar Baalei Chayim]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waiting between meat and dairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Yashan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kashrut]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Lashon_Hara&amp;diff=23254</id>
		<title>Lashon Hara</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Lashon_Hara&amp;diff=23254"/>
		<updated>2019-07-02T02:00:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Lashon Harah is any form of speech or communication that may harm someone else emotionally, financially, physically or damage their general reputation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam, Hilchot De’ot 7:5. Regarding reputation damage, cf. Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 1:1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The severity of Lashon Harah is so awesome that according to the Chafetz Chaim, violating the prohibition of Loshan Harah entails transgressing at least six negative Biblical commandments and at least two positive commandments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah, Peticha. The gemara Yerushalmi Peah 1:1 tells us that just like studying torah is equal to all other mitzvot, so is the sin of lashon hara equal to all other sins. The gemara Sota 42a says that people who speak lashon hara are included among those who are not permitted to greet the Shechinah. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==General guidelines==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s forbidden to speak about anything negative about a fellow Jew even if it’s true. This prohibition is called Lashon Hara. When communicating something false about another person, an even more severe sin is committed, that of Motzei Shem Ra (lit. producing a bad name for someone else). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Deot 7:2, Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:1) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Rechilus / רכילות, comes from the Torah commandment &amp;quot;לא תלך רכיל בעמיך&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;don&#039;t be a talebearer in your nation&amp;quot; (Vayikra 19:16); the word &amp;quot;רכיל&amp;quot;, literally &amp;quot;peddlar&amp;quot;, refers to one who &amp;quot;carries stories&amp;quot; and &#039;peddles&#039; them from one person to another, and says: &amp;quot;such and such ___ said&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;such and such I heard about ___&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Kesef Mishnah Hil&#039; De&#039;ot 7:1 adds that these stories are personal--i.e. ___said this &#039;&#039;about you&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Even if this is true, and there is no denegration, this speech violates a negative commandment, is a severe sin, and causes souls of Jews to be killed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Hilchos De&#039;os 7:1, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 30:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s equally forbidden whether one volunteered or if one was asked for information where one will come to say Lashon Hara or Avak Lashon Hara. One should not listen to one’s father or Rabbi to say Lashon Hara or Avak Lashon Hara. (See circumstances where it is permitted in section Toelet). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:5) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even if taking upon oneself not to speak Lashon Hara will cause one to sustain financial loss such as the loss of one’s job (such as where the employer is very immoral and irreligious and considers one who is careful about this prohibition to be a fool and he’ll fire that person), nonetheless, it is forbidden to speak Lashon Hara. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:6) based on Rama YD 157:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even if it will cause one embarrassment not to say Lashon Hara one may not say Lashon Hara. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:7) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Needless to say, such a heroic moral stance is rewarded exponentially, in line with the rabbinic dictum &amp;quot;Reward is in proportion to the effort.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ethics of the Fathers, Chapter 5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition includes any communication that is verbalized, written, or simply implied even in a silent manner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:8).  The Chafetz Chaim quotes Onkelos on Vayikra 19:16 who translates lo telech rachil as“lo teichol kurtzin.” Rashi explains that this refers to the way one motions with his eyes, even without speaking any words.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even if while saying Lashon Hara one also degrades oneself it’s still forbidden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 1:9) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of negative information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Information is considered negative and damaging even if what is said is true and accurate. The discussion may be of criminal or general misconduct or of lackadaisical Jewish observance – relating either to interpersonal or general spiritual matters. One should not share, for example, that someone else does not give [[charity]] or keep kosher.&lt;br /&gt;
#Defining what is considered negative can be very subjective. It is often relative or subject to judgment of the specific events in question. For example, saying one gives $500 a year to [[charity]] may be very positive or very negative, depending on the person being discussed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 4:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Listening to Lashon Harah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a Biblical prohibition of believing any form of Lashon Harah, even if the subject of discussion is present and does not deny what&#039;s being said about him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 7:1-2 from gemara in Pesachim 87b and 118a. See Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot 181 and Hilchot Sanhedrin 21:7, Sefer HaChinukh 74, Shaarei [[Teshuvah]] 303:211 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The one who accepts Lashon Hara is worse than the one who says it &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 30:2 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#Even if Lashon Harah is said for constructive purposes (and within the guidelines of what is allowed to be said), the listener may not wholeheartedly believe what is being said, but may only take precautions in dealing with the person about whom they have heard negative information. In addition, even if one has resolved not to believe Lashon Harah he might hear, it is still forbidden to continue listening to such conversation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 6:2. Rav Moshe Shternbuch Teshuvot Vihanhagot, 1:555 says that humans are incapable of such control and therefore explains that the prohibition of accepting lashon hara is only to have one&#039;s behavior toward the subject change as a consequence of having heard it. The mental acceptance however is permitted. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Permitted forms of saying Lashon Harah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Saying Lashon Harah is only permitted when said for strictly constructive purposes. Even then, however, one is required to ensure what he is saying meets a criterion of seven conditions:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 10:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##The one saying the Lashon Harah has either personally witnessed or has corroborated that which he is saying with certainty.&lt;br /&gt;
##One is sure the offense committed is in fact wrong, and not just has the appearance of being a problem.&lt;br /&gt;
##Before discussing the negative activity, one has to have attempted to highlight the wrongdoing to the person being spoken about, and have encouraged him to reconsider and change his behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
##One may not exaggerate that which he is retelling in any way whatsoever.&lt;br /&gt;
##He who relays negative information may only do so with a constructive motive and not based on any hatred toward, or thrill from speaking about, the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
##There must be no other way in which to achieve whatever constructive purposes saying the Lashon Harah will accomplish.&lt;br /&gt;
##Even if all other criteria are fulfilled, one still may not say Lashon Harah if the damage caused to the person discussed will be greater than can be justified by the shortcoming in question.&lt;br /&gt;
#On the listener&#039;s part, he or she may only act protectively as a result of negative information heard. However, one may not accept the information heard as fact and consequently express disdain or animosity toward the subject, but only take precautionary measures as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
#If someone sees another Jew sin and he believes that it will be more effective for his father or rebbe to rebuke him than if he were to do so himself then it is permitted to tell his father or rebbe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Hara (ch. 10 fnt. 31 p. 175) based on Kiddushin 33a and Bechorot 30b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Permitted forms of eliciting Lashon Harah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If one is looking to engage another party – for a business partnership or family relationship, for example – and is at a stage where it is appropriate to research someone else&#039;s background, reputation, or character, he is permitted to inquire and obtain relevant information that might otherwise be considered Loshan Harah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 4:11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#One does not have license to obtain any negative information unless it is really relevant and necessary to the potential partnership. Still, even when the impetus for the fact-finding is justified, one is very much obligated to disclose his reason for asking for negative information. This is so the person answering does not relate information with the wrong intention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 4:11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional safeguards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Certain forms of speech are not intrinsically prohibited but are nonetheless instituted rabbinically as safeguards to protect people from speaking Lashon Harah (&amp;quot;Avak Lashon Hara&amp;quot; / אבק לשון הרע). For example, one is not allowed to say, &amp;quot;Who would believe that he would turn out so well?&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Let&#039;s not discuss him, because I do not want to say what he did.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 9:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Also, one may not talk about others in a positive way if doing so will cause the subject suffering or other problems – such as highlighting someone&#039;s extraordinary generosity, as the donor may then be overwhelmed from all the unsolicited attention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 9:1-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inappropriate Praise===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#One must be careful not to praise his friend in front of others who think negatively about him as this may lead them to speak negatively about him. It is also not allowed to speak excessively positively about any individual, as eventually the speaker or listener might be tempted to highlight some of the subject&#039;s negative characteristics as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim Hilchot Lashon Hara 9:1, Gemara Baba Batra 164b, Erchin 16a. Rambam Deot 7:4 writes that one should not praise someone at all in front of his enemy because it will cause the listener to disparage the subject &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#When speaking in front of a large group of people, one is not permitted to speak positively about anyone else for fear of what negative features about the said person those in the audience might begin to discuss among themselves. Obviously if the context and reason for the speech lends to positive discussion – about the honoree of the occasion, for example – then this prohibition does not apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In front of 3 people==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s forbidden to say Lashon Hara in front of one person and all the more so in front of many people. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:1) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, it is permitted to make an ambiguous statement that can be understood in two ways (positively and negatively) about a Jew only if one says it in front of three people. The reasoning is that since it is said in front of 3 people the word will spread to the one being spoken about. If the speaker knows that what he says will be heard by the one he is speaking about, surely he will be careful not to say something that is recognizably derogatory about another. For example, to say &amp;quot;fire can be found in a certain house&amp;quot;: the comment may be construed positively (the family has many children and Hashem blessed them with wealth or that they are extremely hospitable), but it may also be construed as a criticism (i.e. in that house, they always eat gluttonously) . &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:2). This is his understanding of the Rashbam to Bava Basra &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some say that if someone said Lashon Hara before 3 people, even though he certainly violated Lashon Hara, the people who heard it may repeat it to others as long as one doesn’t intend to spread the word and publicize it. Some say it is forbidden except if it comes up tangentially in conversation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:3) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Only those who heard it directly can repeat it, however, one who heard from someone who heard it originally may not repeat it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:4) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If one of the 3 original people who heard it were yireh Hashem who are careful on Lashon Hara then it’s forbidden to repeat it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:5) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Something said before three people may only be repeated within the city and not in another city. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:6) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If the speaker said not to repeat the information to others then it is Lashon Hara to repeat it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:7) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#This leniency only applies to 1 speaking to 3 and not 2 speaking to 2. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:8) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#One may not add even one word or to support it such as saying that story which was heard was accurate. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:9) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it’s well known that a certain person did wrong in his past but now acts properly or it’s well known that his parents did wrong but he acts properly it’s forbidden to say this negative information. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:9) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even if one fulfills the other requirements of BeApei Telata, if someone knows that the one listening will accept this information as true and add to it, it’s forbidden to tell him. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:10) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#One who is careful about their soul would distance themselves from this leniency altogether. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:10) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s absolutely forbidden to say that the Rabbi’s Drashas (Divrei Torah) aren’t substantive or that there’s no point in listening because this is certainly Lashon Hara even if it’s true. If he is someone who is concerned with his soul he would give advice to the Rabbi privately and fulfill viahavta LeReacha Kamocha. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:12) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person revealed information relating to his business before 3 people, one who heard it may repeat it to others as long as he didn’t express that he doesn’t want this information repeated and the other conditions of Apei Telata are followed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 2:13) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In front of one&#039;s fellow==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden to say Lashon Hara even if one would say that information in front of the one who is being spoken about. It’s a grave prohibition to say Lashon Hara about a person actually in front of the one being spoken about. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:1) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#That which Chazal permit when the speaker would have even said it in front of his fellow (the one being spoken about) that’s only to say Avak Lashon Hara which is a statement that can be interpreted in two ways. Thus, if he wouldn’t be embarrassed to say it before his fellow it’s clear that his intent isn’t to say something negative and it’s permitted. However, if he would be embarrassed to say it before his fellow it’s clear that his intent is to say something negative and it’s forbidden. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:2) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s forbidden to say Lashon Hara even if one isn’t doing it out of hatred and intent to speak negatively about one’s fellow and even if it’s just a joke it’s a biblical prohibition. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Deot 7:4, Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:3) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden to say Lashon Hara even if one doesn’t mention the name of one’s fellow but it’s clear from the discussion who that fellow is. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:4) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Lashon Hara includes speech which isn’t negative about one’s fellow but it can cause one’s fellow embarrassment and the speaker intended this.. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:4) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s forbidden even if one says it casually pretending not to know that one is saying Lashon Hara or that these are the deeds of that fellow. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Deot 7:4, Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:5) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#One may not say any negative about one’s fellow even if it will not cause any bad to my fellow. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:6) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If one sees one’s fellow do a sin if he is God fearing one must judge his favorably, if he is in between and the situation is unclear whether he was doing something wrong or not one must judge him favorably and even if the situation leans to the side that he was doing seomthing wrong it’s very proper to leave it as a doubt and not judge him negatively. If the situation is leaning to the side that he didn’t do something wrong it’s forbidden to judge him negatively. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chafetz Chaim (Lashon Hara 3:7) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Saying Lashon Harah without conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The prohibition of Lashon Harah includes speaking about any fellow person – including men, women, children, and relatives, and of any level of Jewish observance. However, if one is a heretic as defined by Jewish law,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cf. Maimonides, Sefer HaMadda, 3:6-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is considered commendable to speak negatively about him in order to assure others disassociate themselves from him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 8:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, if one sees that speaking negatively about someone will help to curtail the damage the subject is intending to bring about unfairly, doing so is permitted – perhaps required even.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim, Hilchot Lashon Harah 8:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To be sure, there are three conditions for doing so:&lt;br /&gt;
##One must be sure that the person in question is attempting to be harmful.&lt;br /&gt;
##Speaking such Lashon Harah cannot be done out of a motive of hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
##If there is any other possible way to prevent damage, one must resort to it and avoid speaking Lashon Harah.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Giving a Business Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an employer is going to go to hire a certain person, and one knows that the potential employee isn’t careful with other people’s money or has some other quality that will cause the employer harm, one should alert the potential employer and it is not considered Lashon Hara because one’s intent is completely to protect the employer and not to degrade the employee. This general rule has a number of important conditions that must be met in order for it to be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
##One shouldn&#039;t decide too quickly that what the employer did was wrong, rather carefully consider if it was wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
##One may not exaggerate.&lt;br /&gt;
##One&#039;s purpose is to protect the employer and not because of personal hatred with the employee.&lt;br /&gt;
##If it is possible to accomplish this task without speaking Lashon Hara, do that and don’t speak Lashon Hara.&lt;br /&gt;
##It is okay if one’s speech will cause the employee to lose a good opportunity, but if one&#039;s speech will cause a negative outcome (taking away something he already has) for the employee it is forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Chafetz Chaim Hilchot Rechilut 9:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About the Land of Israel==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden to say Lashon Hara about the [[land of Israel]], its fruits, its people or any other aspect of it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishpatei Hashalom pg. 220. This is learned from the spies who are punished in Parashat Shelach for their slander of the [[land of Israel]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About Deceased==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is also forbidden to speak Lashon Hara about the deceased. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishpatei Hashalom pg. 220 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Journalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lashon Hara applies to newspapers, journals, magazines and other written sources, as Lashon Hara is not prohibited just for speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chofetz Chaim (Lashon Harah) 1:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Fundamentally, it is permitted, and perhaps you are required, to be aware of the character traits and behavior of your local leadership, so journalism which is written to that end is permitted. However, one must still be very cautious not to deviate from fair judgement and the relevant and necessary information. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Iggeret Chazon Ish, Volume 2, Iggeret 133b, cited in True Facts and False Rumors by Rabbi Daniel Feldman.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/756086/Rabbi_Daniel_Z_Feldman/Contemporary_Issues_in_Lashon_Harah_(Internet,_Purim_Shpiels,_etc)_ Contemporary Issues in Lashon Harah (Internet,_Purim_Shpiels,_etc)_] by Rabbi Daniel Feldman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/743257/Rabbi_Daniel_Z_Feldman/Laws_of_Lashon_Hara_(5770) Laws of Lashon Hara] by Rabbi Daniel Feldman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Between Man And His Fellow]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Yichud&amp;diff=23249</id>
		<title>Yichud</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Yichud&amp;diff=23249"/>
		<updated>2019-07-02T01:28:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Camera */ spelling check&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden from the Torah for a man to seclude himself with a woman to whom he is forbidden. It is Rabbinically forbidden for a man to seclude himself with any woman, even a single woman. It doesn&#039;t matter if the woman is Jewish or non-Jewish.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch EH 22:1-2, Aruch Hashulchan EH 22:1, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 152:1, Yalkut Yosef Hilchot Ishut EH Siman 22:1-2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Gemara Kiddushin 80b and Avoda Zara 36b learns from a Pasuk that Yichud with a relative who one is forbidden to live with (someone who would be in the category of Arayot) is prohibited. The Gemara (Avoda Zara 36b) explicitly calls Yichud with a married women to be a biblical prohibition. Thus, Tur EH 22:1 writes that Yichud with an Erveh is biblical. The Rambam (Issurei Biyah 22:2), however, argues that Yichud is only Divrei Kabbalah. Bet Yosef (EH 22:1) explains that the Rambam holds that the gemara&#039;s expression that Yichud is biblical only meant that it is hinted to in the Torah.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Perisha EH 22 posits that there&#039;s a biblical prohibition to have yichud with someone who is forbidden on a Biblical level (lav). Chazon Ish EH 34:6 agrees.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Gemara Avoda Zara 36b says that the Bet Din of Dovid HaMelech instituted the prohibition of Yichud with a single woman and Bet Shamai and Bet Hillel extended Yichud to a non-Jewish woman as well.&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the prohibition of yichud include a concern of rape or just seduction? Igrot Moshe 4:65:19 writes that yichud was instituted for seduction or mutual consent and not rape.&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there a concern that if a man and woman currently aren&#039;t in a state of yichud that they will move into a state of yichud such as with a car since they might drive to a deserted alley? Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:2-3 is concerned for this. He says that this seems to be the dispute between Rabbenu Yerucham and Maharshal in Bet Shmuel 22:9 and we follow the Maharshal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Multiple Men and Women===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permitted for many men and women to be secluded together.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch EH 22:6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What constitutes many men and many women? Some poskim write that only if there&#039;s 3 men and 3 women &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Birkei Yosef EH 22:3, Pitchei Teshuva 22:5, Chelkat Mechokek EH 22:6 quotes this idea from the Maggid Mishna but questions it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, some say 2 men and 3 women&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bet Shmuel 22:8, Chaye Adam 126:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and some say 2 men and 2 women constitute many men and many women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bach 22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The poskim are general strict to consider it 3 men and 3 women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to Sephardim, one man may not be secluded with multiple woman and one woman may not be secluded with multiple men. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef Hilchot Ishut EH Siman 22:10. According to Yam Shel Shlomo Kiddushin Siman 20 and Sh&amp;quot;t Maharsham 3:152, one man with two women is a biblical prohibition. See however, Sh&amp;quot;t HaRashba 1:587 and Sh&amp;quot;t Chavot Yair 73 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Family Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permitted for a man to seclude himself with his mother, daughter, granddaughter, or wife even when she in her state of Niddah. It is permissible for a man to seclude himself with his sister, however, it shouldn&#039;t be done frequently. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef Hilchot Ishut EH Siman 22:1, Gan Naul pages 9-10. Igrot Moshe EH 4:64 writes that the exact amount of time isn&#039;t critical, it is only permitted if they&#039;re only there as a guest in a very evident way and not living there for some period of time. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A brother and sister still living in their parents home may be left alone together for only a few days and not for an extended period of time. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gan Naul pages 10-12. See Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:11 concludes that this depends on the particular situation.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Yichud with two sisters is forbidden. Some say that yichud with a mother and her daughter or grandmother and her granddaughter or grandson is permitted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:64 at the end&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Husband in the City====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a woman&#039;s husband is in the city, it&#039;s permissible to seclude with her unless one has a close relationship with her (&#039;&#039;Libo Gas Ba&#039;&#039;) such as if one grew up with her or is a relative. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch EH 22:7, Yalkut Yosef Hilchot Ishut EH Siman 22:7 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##What is considered a close relationship such that there is no leniency of having one&#039;s husband in the city? Some say that even a professional acquaintance is considered a close relationship, while others limit it to a step-sibling or a relative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aruch Hashulchan EH 22:6 held that a professional acquaintance is considered libo gas ba but the Tzitz Eliezer 40:12:2 disagreed and quotes the Chida in Shaar Yosef 3 who is lenient. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that this only applies if the husband can come at any moment but not if a person knows that their husband isn&#039;t coming home until a certain time since he&#039;s at work or is involved with a specific task.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others are lenient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef EH 22:7 is lenient even if the husband is on the other side of town or he doesn&#039;t know in where his wife currently is.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Wife Protecting Husband====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#When one’s wife is with him, there is no problem of being alone with other women as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Even Haezer 22:5. Beit Shmuel 22:8 says that the reason for this leniency is that one’s wife is assumed to watch him to avoid sinning. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This only applies if one&#039;s wife is in the same room with him but not if one&#039;s wife is just in the same city.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mother, Daughter, or Sister Breaking Yichud====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Most poskim assume that this leniency of having a very close relative such as one&#039;s wife isn&#039;t yichud and protects from yichud, applies also to one&#039;s mother, daughter, and sister as well. Therefore, if a man is in a room with his wife, mother, daughter or sister, and one other woman he does not violate the yichud prohibition. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pitchei Teshuva EH 22:2 does not extend this Heter to one’s daughter (meaning a man, his daughter and another woman would violate Yichud), while Iggerot Moshe Even Haezer 2:15 extends it to a daughter and in Iggerot Moshe 4:65:8 extends it to a mother, and sister as well. The Nitei Gavriel Yichud 40:1 follows Rav Moshe (and in footnote 1 quotes many others who do as well). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Similarly, the minhag is to permit yichud for a grandchild with one&#039;s grandmother. Then even if there&#039;s another woman there it isn&#039;t yichud because of the presence of the grandmother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Soloveitchik as cited in Nefesh Harav p. 256 was lenient about a man with his grandmother even though there was another one of his female cousins there since the man with his grandmother isn&#039;t yichud and the grandmother protects him from yichud with another woman. Rav Schachter comments that this is in accordance with Igrot Moshe EH 2:15.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sephardim are strict that there is yichud if there&#039;s another women with whom it is permitted to have yichud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Chida in Yosef Ometz 26 writes that even though it is permitted to have yichud with one&#039;s mother it is certainly forbidden to have yichud with your mother and another women with whomm yichud is forbidden. He explains that the only reason it is permitted to have yichud when one&#039;s wife is there is because she&#039;ll protect him from sin, whereas a mother won&#039;t. Minchat Ish 1:11:1 quotes the dispute between the Chida and Rav Chaim Palagi and is strict unless it is only derabbanan yichud. Gan Naul 12:2 is strict unless there is a situation of need in which case there is what to rely upon to be lenient. He cites that Rav Moshe Halevi and Chacham Ben Tzion Abba Shaul were strict on this issue.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open to the Public===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permitted for a man and woman to be secluded with one another in an area that is open to the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kiddushin 81a, Shulchan Aruch EH 22:9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; except at nighttime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beer Heitev 22:9, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 152:5. Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:5 is strict and writes that even in a big city practically there&#039;s no case that one can assume that there&#039;s a concern of someone entering all hours of the night.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nighttime is defined by when people aren&#039;t traveling the streets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dvar Halacha 3:14 quotes the Knesset Hagedola and others that the definition of night for public depends on when people are traveling the streets. He cites the Chazon Ish who said that in Bnei Brak he ruled until 10pm it is considered open to the public.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A door open to the street permits yichud even with a non-Jew or someone who is suspect to immorality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chida in Birkei Yosef 22:9 and Shaar Yosef 3. Dvar Halacha 3:17 agrees. Otzar Haposkim 22:9:11 cites this Chida and no one else on the issue.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A door open to the street only permits that room and not rooms connected to it on other floors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Knesset Hagedolah (Hagahot Tur EH 22:11) writes that a door that&#039;s open to the street only permits that room and not the upper or lower floors connected to that room. The Otzar Haposkim 22:9:5 quotes the Apei Zutrei 22:20 and Nichpeh Bkesef who agree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or even other rooms on that same floor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Otzar Haposkim 22:9:5 quotes the Nidrei Zerizin 2:9 and Bet Shlomo OC 48 who write that rooms connected to a room open to the public are still subject to yichud, only the room that is open to the public itself is permitted. On the other hand, the Ezer Mkodesh seems to be lenient. Dvar Halacha 3:9 quotes this dispute and adds that the Bet Meir is strict but the Maharsham is lenient.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that yichud is only permitted in the area visible to the street but not to areas in the room that aren&#039;t visible from outside.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nitai Gavriel 32:5 writes that any spot in the room that isn&#039;t visible from the outside is forbidden. He supports this from the Bet Shlomo 48, Ezer Mkodesh, Yad Yitzchak 3:220, and Misgeret Hashulchan 152:10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Apartment Buildings====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#An apartment that opens to a courtyard inhabited by three people or more, or someone who would prevent yichud such as a couple, if the door is open to that courtyard that is considered like being open to the public domain. If someone knows that the neighbors aren&#039;t going to enter one&#039;s house the door actually would have to be open and not closed but unlocked according to all opinions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dvar Halacha 3:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Closed But Unlocked====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Some say that as long as the door is unlocked even if it is closed that area is considered open to the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rashba (responsa 1:1251)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however, some say that it is only considered open if the door is actually open.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Teshuva 22:8 quoting the Beit Meir and Rabbi Akiva Eiger (responsa 100)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Practically, some say that one can be lenient only if people in that area enter without knocking and getting permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nitai Gavriel (Yichud 33:1), Dvar Halacha (responsa 26). See Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:4 who is lenient regarding yichud in a room with the door unlocked to the public since almost everyone would answer the door if someone knocked and he&#039;s afraid of someone entering unless it is locked. He adds that this is only applicable if generally people would enter the house without permission if it is unlocked.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say that in cases of need one can be lenient regarding any rabbinical form of yichud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/792159/Rabbi_Uri_Orlian/Hilchos_Yichud Rabbi Uri Orlian in a shiur on yutorah.org (min 70-3)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to those who hold that it is permitted to have yichud in a house that&#039;s closed but unlocked some say that the same is true with a house that is locked but others who would break yichud have the keys and can enter at any time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dvar Halacha 3:3 quoting the Chazon Ish&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====A Woman One Is Comfortable With====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that it is forbidden to seclude oneself with a woman which one is comfortable around in an area open to the public, while others permit it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Chelkat Mechokek 22:13 writes that a person who is comfortable around a certain woman is forbidden to seclude himself with her in an area open to the public. The Taz 22:9, however, disagrees and permits. Chida (Birkei Yosef 22:6 and Birkei Yosef 245:6) proves from Shulchan Aruch and others that it is permitted but he isn&#039;t willing to be lenient. Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 152:5 rules like the Chelkat Mechokek. Misgeret Hashulchan 152:10 cited by Otzar Haposkim 22:9:13 is lenient in extenuating circumstances. Nitai Gavriel (Yichud 32:7) writes that in cases of need such as with a doctor one may be lenient unless the person is comfortable around the woman in an inappropriate sense. Tzitz Eliezer 6:40:12:4-8 is lenient. Gan Naul 8:25 seems to be lenient. He quotes the Shevet Halevi 5:23:7 and Divrei Chachamim 5:11 as permitting, while the Nodeh Beyehuda EH 2:18, Aruch Hashulchan 22:6, and Igrot Moshe EH 4:60 are strict. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Windows to the Street====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a window that makes the room visible from the street someone who is in front of that window is considered as though it is open to the public and there&#039;s no yichud. One condition for this to be applicable is that the window needs to be low enough that people from the street can easily see into the room normally. There are some poskim who hold that if the window is high enough that a person from the street could see in while walking on his tippy toes that is also considered open to the public, while others disagree.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Nodeh Beyehuda 1:71 writes that a window that is visible to the public is considered like the room is open to the public and there&#039;s no yichud. Otzar Haposkim 22:9:4 quotes the Maharsham Introduction to 2:76 who is lenient if you the window is high but can be seen from another house if someone in that other house were to stand on a chair, however, he isn&#039;t lenient with the same situation in the street. Gan Naul 8:18 rules like the Maharsham. Tzitz Eliezer 6:40:11:8 holds that a window permits yichud even if it is only possible to see in from the public while standing on one&#039;s tippy toes. Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:2 seems like he is only lenient with a window if you can be seen normally and not that a person needs to get on his tippy toes. However, the Gan Naul ch. 8 fnt. 59 explains Igrot Moshe in accordance with the Maharsham.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##There are poskim who significantly limit the applicability of this leniency so that it is almost irrelevant. They explain that if the room has a corner or a place in it which isn&#039;t visible from the street through that window then the window isn&#039;t considered open to the public since there&#039;s a concern that a person will walk away from the window into the secluded area of that room.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Ezer Mkodesh 22:9 (cited by Otzar Haposkim 22:9:4) writes that if the room which the window is open to has a corner or secluded area which isn&#039;t visible from the window then the window doesn&#039;t permit anything since there&#039;s a concern that the man and woman will walk into that secluded area. The Bet Yitzchak Glick 3:220:2 and Misgeret Hashulchan 52:10 quote this.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, some poskim say that if the room which has a window is connected to another room that isn&#039;t open to the public then again there is no leniency by having a window the public since it is easy to walk away from the window into the other room.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:2 writes that if the room in which there&#039;s a window is open to another room that isn&#039;t open to the public then yichud is prohibited even in front of the window. See the previous footnote for the explanation.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet some poskim disagree with these last two conditions and hold that a window to the public permits yichud while one is visible to the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gan Naul 8:16 proves from the Nodeh Beyehuda and others that there is no concern that someone who is currently not in a state of yichud will enter into a state of yichud. As such he writes that standing in front of the window that is visible to the public undoes yichud even if it is easily possible to walk into a secluded area. Gan Naul quotes Rav Elyashiv as being lenient on a window in the room even if there are secluded parts of the room as long as one is in front of the window. Dvar Halacha 3:13 agreed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Camera==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Some say that it is forbidden for a man and woman to seclude themselves together even if there&#039;s a camera or webcam that makes everything in the room visible to onlookers in another location. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuntres Internet BeHalacha (p. 33) discusses whether having a webcam is similar to having a door open to the public domain and in the conclusion quotes Rav Elyashiv saying that it is not a valid leniency. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone is monitoring the camera, some poskim say that one can be lenient. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dinonline.org/2012/04/25/yichud-with-video-camera/ yichud with video-camera]. They also write that it is possible that it is also permissible if it is recording, even if nobody is watching. see also [http://www.dailyhalacha.com/m/halacha.aspx?id=714 Rabbi Eli Mansour] DailyHalacha. [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/821147/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-webcams-in-halacha/ Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in a Ten Minute Halacha] explained that it seems that a security camera that can be monitored at any time is enough to prevent yichud.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Car==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#According to Sephardim, if on the road at that time there&#039;s on average a car every 3 minutes and it is possible to see inside the car then there&#039;s no yichud for a man and woman together in a car. If the road isn&#039;t heavily traveled it is forbidden unless there are three men and three women, such as on a bus. However, on a bus where there was three men and three women and then some of them leave, if a woman is left alone with a male driver the woman must exit the bus unless there is a danger to get off. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef Hilchot Ishut EH Siman 22:9, Gan Naul 8:22. Gan Naul cites Rav Meir Mazuz in Or Torah 18:108:37 as agreeing. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to Ashkenazim, some say that it is not proper for a man and woman to travel alone in a car, while many others say that it is only forbidden to travel alone on small streets, where there only a few cars on the road.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*Rav Moshe in Sh”t Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:3 writes that initially it is not proper for a man and woman to travel alone because of a concern that they may stop in a deserted area and do something inappropriate. However, in a case of pressing need such as if a woman in the community needs to go to the same place he’s traveling and if he refuses he’ll be considered selfish, one may rely on those who hold that there’s no concern that they will stop in a deserted area. He compares this to a discussion in the Bet Shmuel 22:9.&lt;br /&gt;
*However, Rav Shlomo Zalman in Minchat Shlomo 1:91(21) writes that sometimes there&#039;s room to be lenient to rely on the fact that the car has windows which are visible to the public and that there&#039;s no concern that they may stop in a deserted place. (See there for more details). Additionally, Rav Vosner in Shevet HaLevi 5:202(1) writes that regarding the nighttime concern, there&#039;s room to be lenient since the person driving can&#039;t fall asleep, however, he adds that since sometimes intercity highways or even local streets become deserted at night one should be strict.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lastly, [http://www.koltorah.org/ravj/The%20Yichud%20Prohibition%20-%20Part%202.htm Rabbi Jachter] quotes Rav Mordechai Eliyahu (cited in Techumin 10:311), Rav Aharon Lichtenstein, and Rav Mordechai Willig as ruling that it is permitted for a man to travel alone in a car with a woman unless they are driving in a very remote area or at a time when there are very few cars on the road. Nitei Gavriel (Yichud 44:1) rules that one roads where cars continue to pass by and the roads are well lit, there&#039;s no Yichud, however, on small streets where not very many cars travel it&#039;s forbidden. See further [http://www.dailyhalacha.com/Display.asp?ClipDate=11/2/2004 Rabbi Mansour on DailyHalacha.com].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elevator==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permissible for a man to enter an elevator with a woman because the time in travel is usually very short.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.koltorah.org/ravj/The%20Yichud%20Prohibition%20-%20Part%202.htm Rabbi Jachter] quoting Teshuvot Igrot Moshe E.H. 4:65:16, Teshuvot Tzitz Eliezer 6:40:22, and Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Minchat Shlomo 1:91:22) say that it is permitted for a man to enter an elevator with a woman and it isn&#039;t yichud.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say that it is permitted if the elevator has a travel time of less than 3 minutes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef ([[Chinuch]] pg 389), Gan Naul 8:21. [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/792159/Rabbi_Uri_Orlian/Hilchos_Yichud Rav Orlian] mentions that potentially going up the glass elevators in CN towers in Toronto which are taller than 1100 ft and the elevators take 58 seconds is a bit of a question of yichud if a man and woman go in together. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Different rooms==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Many authorities hold that one man may not be in the same house as a woman even if they are in different rooms. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sh&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe 4:65:19. [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/762691/Rabbi_Aryeh_Lebowitz/Ten_Minute_Halacha_-_Does_Closing_the_Door_Help_Save_Yichud_Problems Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz] explains that even though Rav Moshe is strict there are some are opinions who are lenient but does not give a final ruling. See also Salmat Chaim 151, Chazon Ish 34:1-2, Shaar HaTziyun 239:27, Chachmat Adam 126:7, Divrei Malkiel 4:22, Tzitz Eliezer 6:40 (chap 7:10). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a woman locks herself in a room and the man in on the outside room that is considered yichud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Doctor and Patient==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#For a dentist/doctor, yichud may be permitted if one is caught up in his work to the point that he will not do anything inappropriate. This leniency doesn&#039;t apply if the patient is the doctor&#039;s last patient unless there is a secretary or someone else in the office who is waiting for the doctor to come out of the room.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igros Moshe (E”H 4:65:1) says that a male OBGYN is so caught up in his work that he will not have any bad desires. He continues that even after he completed seeing the patient and other patients are waiting and he is not necessarily busy with the work at this moment, he doesn’t have time to linger around and must rush to the next patient, so there is no potential issur that he will do in that short time span. If it is the end of the day and no more patients are coming, he can rely on the secretary or someone else in the building to mitigate the issur yichud.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some do not like this heter alone for yichud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach quoted in Nishmat Avraham 3:9 quotes the Gemara Kiddushin 80b which says that yichud applies even to a man and woman who are burying a baby in a cemetery, showing that there is an issur yichud even when one is busy with something where theoretically there should be no yetzer hara. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##A second potential heter for yichud for a dentist/doctor is that he/she will receive professional repercussions if he/she would act inappropriately. This suffices as a preventative measure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Otzar Haposkim 22:8:7 quotes the Yaskil Avdi 2:17, Tzitz Eliezer 6:40:12:8. Nishmat Avraham as quoted by [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/814211/rabbi-mordechai-torczyner/dental-halachah-treating-patients-of-the-opposite-gender/ Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner]. Tzitz Eliezer says that this heter may potentially only apply when both individuals involved are busy with the work. In a dentist/patient relationship, only the dentist is preoccupied, so the heter may not apply. See Chazon Ish EH 35:2 regarding this approach. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##A third way to avoid yichud is by ensuring that other individuals can see inside the room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igros Moshe E”H 4:65:2 says that if a window is low enough for people outside to see, there is no yichud. But if the window is very high to the point that the people outside must climb up a ladder to see inside, which is very unnatural, that would be an issur yichud. When it comes to a dentist/patient, if they are visible to the public through a window, that can potentially avoid yichud.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  or by simply making sure others are present.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Moshe Shternbuch says that if one goes to a dentist/doctor of the opposite gender, one should bring his/her spouse or another relative. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If when a dentist sees a patient he/she closes the door, if others commonly walk in, it could be muttar. But if other people never walk in when the door is closed, it would be assur.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The relationship between a dentist/patient can be transformed into a libo gas ba situation if they develop a relationship through the professional interactions. Then these heteirim would not apply.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, quoted in Nishmat Avraham 3:94-95&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teachers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The minhag is to permit a man to teach girls if he&#039;s married even if his wife isn&#039;t in the same city.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:13 writes that the minhag is to follow Rabbi Akiva Eiger and not the Chelkat Mechokek 22:21 on this question.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A woman can be a teacher for boys if her husband is in the town all the time (so that no issue of yichud arises).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 4:65:18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.torah.org/advanced/weekly-halacha/5757/achrei.html Article on Selected Halachos relating to Parshas Achrei Mos] by Rabbi Doniel Neustadt&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/913334/rabbi-uri-orlian/practical-applications-of-hilchos-yichud/ Practical Applications of Hilchos Yichud] by Rabbi Uri Orlian&lt;br /&gt;
*Minchat Ish by Rav Ayal Sharga, the son of Rav Baruch Sharga, a major Sepharadi Rosh Kollel in Eretz Yisrael. ([https://www.otzar.org/wotzar/Book.aspx?148297&amp;amp; Volume One], [https://www.otzar.org/wotzar/Book.aspx?148298&amp;amp; Volume Two]), useful for Sephardim in the absence of extensive Teshuvot from Rav Ovadia&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.toratemetfreeware.com/online/f_02536.html Gan Naul], another useful Sefer for Sepharadim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Negiah&amp;diff=23248</id>
		<title>Negiah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Negiah&amp;diff=23248"/>
		<updated>2019-07-02T01:27:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: I put int he footnote of &amp;quot;mixed danding is frbidden&amp;quot; what it initially said: mixed dancing is a terrible sin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#It is forbidden to affectionately touch individuals of the opposite gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Issurei Biah 21:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that it is permitted to shake a woman&#039;s hand in a professional context if she extends her hand first. However, other poskim forbid doing so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Moshe Feinstein in Igrot Moshe EH 1:56 writes that some rabbis who permit shaking a woman&#039;s hand if she extends hers he would understand that it was based on the concept of that it wasn&#039;t derech chiba. However, he writes that he thinks that it is a weak argument to rely on.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Ideally, one should try to see a doctor of the same gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nishmas Avraham Yoreh Deah 195&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, it is permitted to see a doctor of the opposite gender if there is no other option.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Moshe Feinstein, Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (as quoted by [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/814211/rabbi-mordechai-torczyner/dental-halachah-treating-patients-of-the-opposite-gender/ Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gemara Ta’anit 21b brings a story of Abba Umna who was a doctor and is praised for putting the men and women in separate areas and for having a special garment that covered the women when he was treating them. This Gemara implies that it is unique and praiseworthy that Abbau Umna did this, which shows that the ordinary person is not required to do these things. This can be a source for male doctors being permitted to touch female patients while treating them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Gemara Bava Metziah 91a quotes Rav Yehuda who says that a professional who causes two animals to mate directly is not doing anything wrong because he is involved in his professional job. There is no problem of Pritzus because he is busy with his professional job, so he will not have any inappropriate urges.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shach Yoreh Deah 195:20 says that according to the Rambam, the only issur of negiah is when the negiah is with hana’a, or pleasure, but in medical care there is no pleasure involved so it would be muttar to treat a patient of the opposite gender.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Mixed dancing is forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zichron Yosef OC 17 even says that it is a terrible sin.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Taking a subway or bus at a crowded time is permitted even though you might bump into the opposite gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 2:14 writes that it is permitted to take the subway or buses even if it is likely that one might bump into a woman. According to the Shach YD 157:10 and 195:20, since it isn&#039;t derech chiba it isn&#039;t forbidden to touch a married woman or niddah. He argues that even according to the Shulchan Aruch 195:17 who is strict regarding your wife when she is a niddah if it isn&#039;t derech chiba, that is only a stringency relevant to one&#039;s wife since it could lead to derech chiba. However, for other woman even Shulchan Aruch could be lenient. Igrot Moshe follows the Shach. He adds that if this type of touching will lead him to have a hirhur if he has to go to work at that work he can go and try to avoid the hirhur by thinking about Torah. If he can&#039;t help himself because he knows he&#039;s going to be aroused then he may not go to work that way. But he says that it is forbidden to have such a lustful nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Still it is proper to avoid sitting next to a woman on a public bus or train.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef (Otzar Dinim L&#039;isha 60:19)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Interactions between Men and Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Negiah&amp;diff=23247</id>
		<title>Negiah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Negiah&amp;diff=23247"/>
		<updated>2019-07-02T01:26:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: I changed &amp;quot;mixed dancing is a terrible sin&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;mixed dancing is forbidden.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#It is forbidden to affectionately touch individuals of the opposite gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Issurei Biah 21:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Some poskim hold that it is permitted to shake a woman&#039;s hand in a professional context if she extends her hand first. However, other poskim forbid doing so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Moshe Feinstein in Igrot Moshe EH 1:56 writes that some rabbis who permit shaking a woman&#039;s hand if she extends hers he would understand that it was based on the concept of that it wasn&#039;t derech chiba. However, he writes that he thinks that it is a weak argument to rely on.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Ideally, one should try to see a doctor of the same gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nishmas Avraham Yoreh Deah 195&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, it is permitted to see a doctor of the opposite gender if there is no other option.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Moshe Feinstein, Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (as quoted by [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/814211/rabbi-mordechai-torczyner/dental-halachah-treating-patients-of-the-opposite-gender/ Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gemara Ta’anit 21b brings a story of Abba Umna who was a doctor and is praised for putting the men and women in separate areas and for having a special garment that covered the women when he was treating them. This Gemara implies that it is unique and praiseworthy that Abbau Umna did this, which shows that the ordinary person is not required to do these things. This can be a source for male doctors being permitted to touch female patients while treating them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Gemara Bava Metziah 91a quotes Rav Yehuda who says that a professional who causes two animals to mate directly is not doing anything wrong because he is involved in his professional job. There is no problem of Pritzus because he is busy with his professional job, so he will not have any inappropriate urges.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shach Yoreh Deah 195:20 says that according to the Rambam, the only issur of negiah is when the negiah is with hana’a, or pleasure, but in medical care there is no pleasure involved so it would be muttar to treat a patient of the opposite gender.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Mixed dancing is forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zichron Yosef OC 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Taking a subway or bus at a crowded time is permitted even though you might bump into the opposite gender.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Igrot Moshe EH 2:14 writes that it is permitted to take the subway or buses even if it is likely that one might bump into a woman. According to the Shach YD 157:10 and 195:20, since it isn&#039;t derech chiba it isn&#039;t forbidden to touch a married woman or niddah. He argues that even according to the Shulchan Aruch 195:17 who is strict regarding your wife when she is a niddah if it isn&#039;t derech chiba, that is only a stringency relevant to one&#039;s wife since it could lead to derech chiba. However, for other woman even Shulchan Aruch could be lenient. Igrot Moshe follows the Shach. He adds that if this type of touching will lead him to have a hirhur if he has to go to work at that work he can go and try to avoid the hirhur by thinking about Torah. If he can&#039;t help himself because he knows he&#039;s going to be aroused then he may not go to work that way. But he says that it is forbidden to have such a lustful nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Still it is proper to avoid sitting next to a woman on a public bus or train.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef (Otzar Dinim L&#039;isha 60:19)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Interactions between Men and Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Laws_of_Learning_Torah&amp;diff=23246</id>
		<title>Laws of Learning Torah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Laws_of_Learning_Torah&amp;diff=23246"/>
		<updated>2019-07-02T01:17:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Learning_torah.jpg|250px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Learning Torah is incredibly important and rivals all other mitzvot in its importance. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Peah 1:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Chazal tell us that &amp;quot;regardless, if one brings a large Korban or a small one as long as one&#039;s intentions are for heaven one&#039;s korban is accepted.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Menachot 110a &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The same idea applies to Torah study. One should learn as much as one can and that is precious in God&#039;s eyes as long as one&#039;s intentions are pure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Brurah 1:12 writes that this principle also applies to Torah learning. Halacha Brurah 1:11 concurs and writes that such is evident from [[Brachot]] 5b. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If one likes to learn and really understands his learning, one can refrain from extending [[Tefillah]] and only say the portions that are obligatory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eliyah Rabba 1:1, Lechem Chamudot ([[Brachot]] HaRoeh 84), Birkei Yosef 1:9, Mishna Brurah 1:12, Halacha Brurah 1:11, Kaf HaChaim 1:31. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Someone who learns Torah purely for the sake of heaven is deserving of great rewards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Avot 6:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even if a person finds himself encouraged to learn for ulterior reasons he should continue to learn and eventually reach the level of learning purely. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemara Pesachim 50b&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many emphasize that nowadays it is critical to start learning with an external motivation in order to overcome the Yetzer Hara and become involved in learning Torah&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://he.wikisource.org/wiki/%D7%A0%D7%A4%D7%A9_%D7%94%D7%97%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%A9%D7%A2%D7%A8_%D7%92* Nefesh HaChaim (Shaar 3* ch. 1 s.v. vegam)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and once one is involved it&#039;ll help purify oneself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gra (Mishlei 25:21) writes that even learning which is shelo lishma helps combat the yetzer hara.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If one learns and doesn&#039;t understand what is learning it isn&#039;t considered Talmud Torah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Magen Avraham 50:2, Mishna Brurah 50:2. Chida in Marit Haayin Avoda Zara 19a s.v. vamar explains that the Gemara which encourages learning without understanding to mean that if one can&#039;t understand it one should still learn without understanding. Or that one should learn even if one only understands the words without understanding the greater context. Ayin Yakov explains that it is referring to someone understanding but has questions on it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many poskim say that it is considered Talmud Torah when reading Tanach even if one doesn&#039;t understand it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Harav 2:12:13. See Divrei Shmuel Al Hatorah p. 11 who quotes the Likutei Maamarim of the Chafetz Chaim as arguing that without understanding even reading mikrah isn&#039;t learning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tanach, Mishna, and Talmud==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#One should apportion one&#039;s time to study torah everyday into three, one portion for Tanach and some say it&#039;s commentaries, one portion for Mishna and Gemara, and one portion to analyze the primary ways the Torah is learnt so that one will know that which is forbidden and that which is permitted. After one grows in Torah one should review Tanach, Mishna, and Gemara, but focus on analyzing Torah. Some say that by learning Talmud Bavli one fulfills learning each area of Torah because the Bavli includes everything, nonetheless, certainly one must still know Tanach and Mishna. Some say that one should devote more time to Mishna than to Tanach and more time to Gemara than to Mishna each one according to its difficulty. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See next footnote&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Many authorities emphasize that it&#039;s absolutely crucial to learn Halacha so that one knows what one must do as well as mussar which subjugates the Yetzer Hara. Some say that these are included in the above three categories. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*In Gemara Kiddushin 30a, Rav Safra interprets the word “ושננתם” as ושלשתם which means that one should split one’s time in three in study Torah, one third to study Mikrah, one third to study Mishna, and one third to study Talmud. The Gemara says that since one doesn’t know how long one will live, one should split up one’s days in three ways. Rashi s.v. LeYomi explains that one should split up the days of the week into these three parts. However, Tosfot s.v. Lo argues that it means that one should split up every single day into these three sections. Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:12) and S”A 246:4 agree with Tosfot.&lt;br /&gt;
*Tosfot also quotes the Rabbenu Tam who says that we rely on only learning Talmud Bavli which itself is a combination of Mikrah, Mishna, and Gemara.&lt;br /&gt;
*Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:11) writes that Mikrah means Torah SheBaal Peh, Mishna means Torah SheBichtav, and Gemara means comparing, analyzing, thinking, and understanding the primary ways the Torah is learnt so that one will know that which is forbidden and that which is permitted. Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:12) continues to say that this only applies in the beginning of one’s learning, however, after one has acquired wisdom one should review Torah SheBaal Peh at certain times but primarily one will spend one’s time on Gemara as he defined above. Kesef Mishna (Talmud Torah 1:12) writes that the Rambam&#039;s reason is obvious because study of Talmud is the most time consuming and this is the basis for the minhag not to apportion one&#039;s time in three parts.&lt;br /&gt;
*S”A 246:4 rules like the Rambam and the Rama rules like the Rabbenu Tam. Aruch HaShulchan YD 246:14 writes that the halacha and minhag follow the Rabbenu Tam, however, certainly one must still know Mikrah and Mishna.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ran (Avoda Zara 5b s.v. Ki) writes that certainly Talmud requires more time than Mishna and Mishna more than Mikrah rather the Gemara just means that one should apportion each area of Torah it’s proper time. Biur HaGra YD 246:15 quotes this Ran. S”A HaRav (Talmud Torah 2:2) writes that it’s good to abide by this opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
*S”A YD 246:4 writes that Mikrah means the 24 books of Torah. Aruch HaShulchan 246:13 explains that Mikrah includes the 24 books of Tanach and also their explanations. However, the S”A HaRav (Talmud Torah 2:1) writes that the explanations of Tanach is considered Mishna which is all an explanation of the 613 מצות.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Shach 246:5 quotes the Drisha who writes that some people only learn Gemara, Rashi, and Tosfot and they don’t fulfill the statement of the Gemara Niddah 73a which says that a person should learn Halachot every day meaning Halacha Pesukot (Halachic rulings of the poskim). He adds that the Rabbenu Tam’s idea that Gemara Bavli includes everything only refers to those who can learn 9 hours a day but those who learn 3 or 4 hours shouldn’t just learn Gemara. Mishna Brurah (Introduction to Mishna Brurah, vol 1) quotes this and expands on it.&lt;br /&gt;
*On the other hand, Birkei Yosef YD 246:4 laments the fact that many people only read the abridged halachot as they despair from the difficult study of talmud because they are decreasing torah (against the principle of &amp;quot;VeYagdil Torah VeYadir&amp;quot;) and causing the reasonings of halachot to be forgotten.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kitzur S”A 27:3 writes that someone who can’t learn as his main focus but can at least set aside times to learn, at those times he should learn Halacha which every Jew needs to know and Mussar which subjugate the Yetzer Hara. Shulchan Aruch HaRav (Talmud Torah 246:2) seems to say that Mussar is included in the category of Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
*S”A HaRav (Hilchot Talmud Torah 2:1) explains that Mishna includes the Halacha Pesuka of the Mishnayot and Britot which explain the details of the 613 מצות and nowadays Mishna includes the Halacha Pesuka of the Shulchan Aruch and Rama. S”A HaRav adds that Talmud means understanding the reasons of the halachot in the משניות and Britot and nowadays that means the Rosh and Bet Yosef who explain the reasons of the halachot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See further in the next section regarding Halacha and Mussar.&lt;br /&gt;
#Based on this concept, there is a practice to recite a portion from Torah, Mishna, and Gemara after Birchot HaTorah before Pesukei DeZimrah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Amram Goan (cited by Tosfot Kiddushin 30a s.v. lo) established learning a piece of torah, mishna, and talmud each day before pesukei d’zimrah. Tosfot Avoda Zara 19b s.v. yeshalesh, Ritva Avoda Zara 19b s.v. vekatvu, and Hagahot Maimoniyot (Talmud Torah 1:8) cite this establishment. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;chokleyisrael&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Some have the righteous practice of learning [[Chok LeYisrael]] which is a daily learning regiment set up by the Arizal that includes pesukim from Torah, Nevuim, Ketuvim, Mishnayot, Gemara, Zohar, Halacha, and Mussar. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The source for such a schedule is the Arizal (Shaar Mitzvot VaEtchanan). Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 27:3 writes that it&#039;s praiseworthy to learn the [[Chok LeYisrael]] daily. Further on the topic, see the Machzik Bracha 156:6, Sh”t Shalmat Chaim Zonenfeld Y”D 89, Kaf HaChaim 132:6, 155:3, and Sh”t Yabia Omer (Y”D 4:31(5), O”C 9:108(79)). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Halacha and Mussar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It&#039;s very important to learn Mussar daily because the greater one is, the greater one&#039;s Yetzer hara is. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Sukkah]] 52a &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Torah was created as an antidote to the Yetzer Hara. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kedushin 30b &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even if learning Mussar takes away from learning other portions of Torah like Gemara, it&#039;s important to study Mussar. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Birkei Yosef 1:9 and Chaye Adam ([[Yom Kippur]] Klal 432) write that one should study Mussar daily even at the expense of torah study time. Mishna Brurah 1:12 (and Shaar Tzion 1:26), Halacha Brurah (1:11 and 55:4), and Halichot Olam (8 pg 336) quote this as halacha. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Someone who only has 2 or 3 hours to learn daily should learn Halacha from Shulchan Aruch and commentaries or from contemporary Poskim so that one will be knowledgeable in practical laws and not come to do a sin without knowing. This is more preferable than learning Daf Yomi, or Gemara and Rishonim from which one can’t derive practical halacha. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Derisha Y”D 246:6, Shach Y”D 246:5 write that someone who only has a little time should learn from the poskim as it says in Nidda 73a someone who learns Halachot every day is a Ben Olam Haba. Shulchan Aruch HaRav (Tamud Torah 2:9), Yarot Devash, Derech HaChaim, Sh”t Teshuva MeAhava (Introduction to 2nd volume), Sh”t Yachave Daat 6:52, Kaf HaChaim Palagi 29:9, Mishna Brurah 155:3, and Halacha Brurah 155:4 concur. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Learning Kabbalah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s forbidden for someone to learn Kabbalah unless has learned seriously all of Gemara and Poskim, and is a Talmud Chacham ingrained with Yirat Shamayim. One should protest if someone is teaching Kabbalah to the public especially if the teacher himself isn’t fitting to learn it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zohar (Pekudei 247b) describes the importance of learning the secrets of Torah and it’s reward. However the poskim write that one needs to have first learned Gemara and Poskim including Etz Chaim (pg 1d), Rama Y”D 246:4, Maharsha (Chagiga 13a), Shelah (Eser Maamarot 29b), Sh&amp;quot;t Yabia Omer 10:23 and Sh”t Yachave Daat 4:47. Interestingly, S”A HaRav (Talmud Torah 2:1) writes that Kabbalah is included in the section of Talmud (one of the three sections a person should learn daily, see above).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Learning at day and night==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#One should establish a fixed time to learn after [[davening]]. One should make certain that that time is fixed and one doesn&#039;t miss it even if one thinks one can make a lot of money by missing it. If one has a great need that one needs to leave for, one should learn at least one pasuk or one halacha. After finishing whatever was pressing one should complete one&#039;s daily standard amount. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 27:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It’s important to learn at night and not waste it all with sleep, eating, and talking because one accomplishes most of his learning at night &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam (Talmud Torah 3:13). Shulchan Aruch 238:1 rules this with the language one must be very careful to learn torah at night, more careful than the day! &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that learning is not easily forgotten and is considered like the Avoda of the [[Korbanot]]. The joy of Torah is specifically felt for learning at night and Hashem grants a special Chesed for one who learns at night. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avoda Zara 3b. The gemara in Eruvin 65a says that night was created specifically for Torah study. The gemara in Chagigah 12b says that one who studies Torah at night will enjoy Hashem’s grace by day, as the pasuk in Psalms 42:9 says “By day, G-d will direct His grace, and at night, His song is with me.” &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#There&#039;s a special practice to &amp;quot;join the day and night&amp;quot; with learning or [[davening]] by learning during sunset and sunrise. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 1:6), Bear Hetiev 238:1, and Mishna Brurah 1:2 in of the Shlah HaKadosh in fulfillment of the pasuk in Yehoshua 1:8 &amp;quot;you shall meditate on it day and night.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If one has a certain daily schedule of learning and hasn&#039;t completed it yet, one should finish it at night. However, preferably one should make a stipulation not to accept the daily schedule as a neder, but rather bli neder in case one misses a day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 238:2, Mishna Brurah 238:5, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 71:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Learning Tanach at night==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#According to the Kabbalah, it&#039;s preferable not to learn Tanach at night. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Birkei Yosef 1:13, 238:2 in name of the Arizal, Ben Ish Chai Pekudei #7, Kaf HaChaim 237:9. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some argue that one may be lenient. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaar HaTziyun 238:1 in name of the Pri Megadim. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, since it&#039;s not forbidden but only preferable, if not learning Tanach will cause [[Bitul Torah]] (Chas VeShalom) one may learn Tanach. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Piskei Teshuvot 238:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permissible to read Tehilim at night if read as a [[prayer]] for the sick or for another cause. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sh&amp;quot;t Tzitiz Eliezer 8:2 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permissible to read Tanach on Friday night or the night of [[Yom Tov]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Piskei Teshuvot 238:1, Sh&amp;quot;t Yabia Omer 6:30, Sh&amp;quot;t Maharashdam 1:158 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permissible to learn Tanach along with Rashi at night. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sh&amp;quot;t Veyeche Yacov O&amp;quot;C 9, Piskei Teshuvot 238:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Women Learning Torah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Women are exempt from learning Torah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:1)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nonetheless, women may learn torah and will be rewarded for their actions. However, women are obligated to learn the laws of the mitzvot that apply to them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 246:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Exemption&#039;&#039;&#039;: The Gemara Kiddushin 29b derives from the pasuk that women are exempt form learning Torah. Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:1) and Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 246:6 codify this.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Potential Issue&#039;&#039;&#039;: The Mishna Sotah 20a cites a dispute between Rabbi Eliezer and Ben Azay whether a father should or should not teach a daughter torah. The Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:13) and Shulchan Aruch 246:6 codify the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer that a father should not teach his daughter. According to Rashi (Sotah 21b s.v. keilu) Rabbi Eliezer holds that it is forbidden to teach a daughter Torah because it may lead to using her cleverness acquired from Torah in order to sin stealthily. Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:13) interprets the gemara to mean that teaching a daughter torah is prohibited because she might misunderstand Torah and make a mockery of its true intent.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;On her own initiative&#039;&#039;&#039;: Both the Rambam and Shulchan Aruch ibid. write that a woman may learn Torah on their own and is rewarded for it like someone who isn&#039;t obligated in a mitzvah and fulfills it. Prisha YD 246:15 explains that a woman may learn on her own even Torah SheBaal Peh because once she decided to learn on her own we can assume that she isn&#039;t going to cause Torah to become a mockery. The Chida in Tov Ayin (Siman 4) agrees. Tzitz Eliezer 9:3:1-3 supports this opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Torah Shebichtav&#039;&#039;&#039;: The Rambam ibid. writes that preferably one shouldn&#039;t teach women Torah Shebichtav. Taz YD 264:4 writes that it is permitted and even ideal to teach women Torah Shebichtav on a simple level. Sheol UMeishiv 3:41 and Atret Zekenim OC 47:3 agree.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Learning Halacha&#039;&#039;&#039;: The Agur (Siman 2) writes that women are obligated to learn the halachot that apply to them. Sefer Chasidim 313, Maharil 45:2, Rama YD 246:6, Taz 47:14, and Shulchan Aruch HaRav (Talmud Torah 1:16) agree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non-Jews Learning Torah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#In general, it is forbidden for non-Jews to learn Torah &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sanhedrin 59a. Along the same lines, Rabbi Dovid Tzvi Hoffman (Melamed Leho&#039;il Y.D. 2:77, cited by Rabbi Shlomo Brody in A Guide to the Complex pg. 181), allows Jews to teach non-Jews any narrative portions of the Torah, as those portions will inspire those non-Jews to believe in the grandeur of God and appreciate the &#039;&#039;sheva Mitzvot Bnei Noach&#039;&#039; more.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for Jews to teach non-Jews Torah&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chagiga 13a. Tosefot &#039;&#039;ibid&#039;&#039; s.v. &amp;quot;Ein&amp;quot; asks why there is a need to forbid teaching non-Jews if the gemara in Sanhedrin 59a already forbid non-Jews from learning Torah. Tosefot explains that the prohibition of teaching a non-Jew Torah is meant to apply even in cases where the non-Jew has other sources of learning Torah aside from you.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but the &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039; established several exceptions, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
##Some &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039; maintain that this prohibition applies only to non-Jews who deny the divinity of the Torah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shu&amp;quot;t HaRambam 147, cited in A Guide to the Complex, pg. 181&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##Since non-Jews are commanded in the &#039;&#039;sheva Mitzvot Bnei Noach&#039;&#039;, some &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039; hold that it is appropriate to teach them the sections of the Torah that pertain to those Mitzvot.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##Some &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039; allow teaching any sections of Tanach to non-Jews but prohibit teaching non-Jews the Oral Law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Netziv (Meishiv Davar 2:77), Maharatz Chayot (Sota 35b s.v. “li-Divarecha”). Meiri Sanhedrin 59a s.v. &amp;quot;Ben Noach&amp;quot; (also footnote 3 in ed. Kedem Yerushalayim) implies that he distinguishes between Tanach and Talmud because he says, &amp;quot;if [the non-Jew] learned Torah not with the goal of fulfilling the Mitzvot; rather, he wants to delve into the knowledge of our Torah and &#039;&#039;Talmudeinu&#039;&#039;, then [such a person] is fitting to be punished.&amp;quot; [https://www.etzion.org.il/en/shiur-08-talmud-torah-non-jews Rabbi Tzvi Sinensky] explains that this idea might be rooted in the fundamental principle that the Jewish people’s covenant with God is rooted in the Oral Torah, not Scripture.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the non-Jew wants to learn Torah in-depth in order to learn about Judaism and the Torah due to intellectual interest, then some &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039; permit teaching Torah to non-Jews.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Seridei Esh 2:26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teaching Torah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#All who are obligated to learn Torah are also obligated to teach Torah. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemara Kiddushin 29b, Mishneh Torah Hilchot Talmud Torah 1:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Specifically, a father is obligated to teach his son Torah. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishneh Torah Hilchot Talmud Torah 1:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The obligation begins when the son begins to talk, he should be taught &amp;quot;Torah Tziva Lanu Moshe..&amp;quot; as well as the first pasuk of Kriat Shema. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bayit HaYehudi vol. 3 pg. 136 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A father is required to provide a Torah education for his son even if it will require him paying for a private teacher or private school. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bayit Yehudi vol. 3 pg. 136  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#A man is even obligated to teach his grandson Torah. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemara Kiddushin 30a, Mishneh Torah Hilchot Talmud Torah 1:2 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Children are exempt from [[learning Torah]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam (Talmud Torah 1:1) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Learning Aloud==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#One should make sure to learn Torah out loud. If one learns out loud, one will be blessed to remember one&#039;s learning. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eirvuin 54a, Rambam (Talmud Torah 3:12), Shulchan Aruch YD 246:22, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 27:5. Chida in Petach Eynayim (Eruvim 54a) writes that as the pasuk in Beresheet 27:22 הקל קול יעקב one קול, voice, is spelled complete and one is complete without a vav, to indicate that when we pray we silently and when we learn we learn aloud. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bruria, the wife of Rebbe Meir, was passing a student who was studying silently without verbalizing what he was learning. She rebuked him and said that his manner of study was incorrect because the verse states, “Life comes to the one who comes upon them” which is meant to be understood as, “life comes to the one who articulates its words with one’s mouth.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eruvin 53b-54a &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#When one learns one should learn out loud but it’s considered Talmud Torah even if one only thinks about it and doesn&#039;t even enunciate the words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rav Ovadia Yosef in Halichot Olam (8 pg 390) and Anaf Etz Avot (Avot 3:3). Rav Ovadia cites the Rashbetz Avot 3:3, Yereyim 27, and Shitah Mikubeset Brachot 15b all say that learning in thought is called learning. Interestingly, the Maharal (Derech Chaim Avot 3:6) writes that when learning with someone else, such as a chevruta, one is forced explain the issue in words in order to discuss it. In this manner, one accomplishes the an awesome fulfillment of learning Torah which is spoken aloud. However, when one learns alone, even if one says the words aloud, primarily it is a mental thought process and the words are insignificant, which is a lower level of learning Torah. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some poskim hold that for Mikra if one doesn&#039;t enunciate the words it isn&#039;t considered learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch Harav 2:12 writes that if for Mikra one doesn&#039;t enunciate the words that one is learning it isn&#039;t considered learning at all. Gevurat Yitzchak v. 2 pp. 19-20 Sotah 32b s.v. layma proves from the Shitah Mikubeset Brachot 13a citing the Raavad that if one doesn&#039;t enunciate the words of Mikra when learning it doesn&#039;t fulfill the mitzvah.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Learning with a Chevrusa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Even though it is preferable and advantageous to learn with a Chevruta (partner) or in a Chabura (group) nonetheless, one who learns by oneself, fulfills the Mitzvah Deoritta of Talmud Torah. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tanna Dvei Eliyaho 23 writes that Hashem finds favor in the Jewish people because they learn in groups (Chabura’s). Pirkei Avot 3:2-3 says that an individual who learns gets reward for learning, two who learn together have their Torah written in Hashem’s Sefer Zichronot and the Shechina is present, while ten who learn together have the Shechina precede the group in wait for their learning. [[Brachot]] 63b says that one really acquires his Torah that he learns in a Chabura. From the above it just seems that there are good levels of learning and then higher forms, yet from Tanit 7a which says that Talmidei Chachamim who learn by themselves are cursed, become foolish, and sin, it seems that learning as an individual is problematic. Nonetheless, because nowadays we learn from a Sefer it’s permissible (Halichot Olam 8 pg 390) and Yavetz (Introduction) writes that it doesn’t apply to learning in [[Israel]] where the air makes one wise. Even though, Maharal (Derech Chaim (Avot 3:3)) writes that learning by oneself even if one says it out loud isn’t considered Osek in Divrei Torah, Halichot Olam rejects using this for halachic implications because one makes [[Brachot HaTorah]] for Torah one learns by oneself and also Mishna Brurah (Beiur Halacha beginning of 155) writes that the mitzvah of Talmud Torah also applies to learning individually. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interrupting Torah Learning==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Regarding what to do when learning Torah comes into conflict with other mitzvot, see [[Which_Mitzvot_take_precedence%3F#Learning_Torah_and_Other_Mitzvot]].&lt;br /&gt;
#One should not interrupt Torah learning to answer Baruch Hu Ubaruch Shemo. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzur Shulchan Aruch of Rav Rephael Baruch Toledano, Volume 1, Page 111 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Should one interrupt one&#039;s learning in order to say the bracha on lightning and thunder? See [[Bracha_For_Seeing_Natural_Wonders#Lightning_and_Thunder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prerequisites for Learning Torah==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#One should not learn Torah if one needs to go to the bathroom.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama 92:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some say that it is permitted if one can hold it in for 72 minutes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Brurah 92:7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and others say it is forbidden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaarei Teshuva 6:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Learning in Front of Ervah===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden to learn Torah in a place where there is ervah exposed. A tefach of a woman that is usually covered is considered ervah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 75:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Hair of married women is considered ervah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 75:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#One shouldn&#039;t learn torah where there is a woman singing including your wife.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 75:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to Sephardim, it is permitted to learn Torah in front of ervah if one closes one&#039;s eyes. According to Ashkenazim one may not learn in front of ervah unless one turns one&#039;s body away and doesn&#039;t see it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 75:6, Mishna Brurah 75:29&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permitted to think Torah in front of ervah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Brurah 75:29&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Learning in an Unclean Place===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is forbidden to learn Torah in front of feces. However, if the feces are covered even by glass or something transparent it is permitted to learn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 76:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there are feces before him in a moving state it is forbidden to learn Torah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 76:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If someone didn&#039;t wipe themselves properly and there are feces on his body by his private area he may not learn Torah even if they are covered,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yoma 30a, Shulchan Aruch 76:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is permitted to learn in a house and not be concerned that there are feces in it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch 76:7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#In the days of Chazal an area there was a children was considered suspect of being unclean and it would be forbidden to learn unless it is checked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mishna Brurah 76:23 based on Rabbenu Yonah. Aruch Hashulchan 76:17 writes that one doesn&#039;t have to check the area for feces before learning even if there are children around unless it entered one&#039;s mind that there is a concern that there is feces.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today even if there are children at home the home is considered as having a status of clean from feces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Piskei Teshuvot 76:10 citing Or Letzion 2:6:14, Halichot Shlomo 22:4, Mishna Halachot 11:59, Ishei Yisrael 52 fnt. 67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Taking Money for Learning and Teaching Torah==&lt;br /&gt;
===Learning Torah===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The mishna in Mesekhes Avos states that one should not derive benefit from his Torah learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avos 4:5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Rambam Avos 4:5 and in Hilchos Talmud Torah perek 3.  explains that it is a desecration of G-d’s name, and by extension His Torah, to make Torah learning into a money-making profession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Rambam lists several different reasons as to why taking money for Torah is wrong. Besides the consideration of chillul Hashem, the Rambam adds that melachah is a positive virtue which prevents falling into sin (Hilchos Talmud Torah 3:10). Thus, if a person is only learning and is not working he may run a greater risk of falling prey to sin.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Many gedolei Yisroel throughout the generations disagreed with the Rambam. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See the Tashbetz’s reaction to the Rambam (Shut Tashbetz 1:142), where he notes that it was always the practice that Bnei Yisroel have supported their Torah scholars. He brings several proofs from midrashic and Talmudic sources that it is permissible, or perhaps even obligatory, for Torah scholars to accept wealth that matches their stature. The Rama YD 246:21 codifies the Tashbetz’s opinion. Also, Kesef Mishna (Talmud Torah 3:10) emphasizes that there was a strong minhag to be lenient on this, and he ends off by saying that even if the halacha is like the Rambam, maybe we should apply the rule of &amp;quot;et laasot l&#039;hashem&amp;quot;. He repeats this sentiment in Bet Yosef YD 246:21.&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharshal (Yam Shel Shlomo Chullin 3:9) is adamantly opposed to the opinion of the Rambam if not taking money will cause bitul torah. He says that if a person can learn more by taking money to learn, he should do so, and it is an aveirah not to take it! &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, some poskim limit the scope of the Rambam’s psak and conclude that even he would agree that it is permissible to take money for Torah learning if learning would otherwise be impossible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, see Rav Moshe Feinstein’s approach to the Rambam in Igros Moshe (Yoreh Deah 4:36). He contends that the Rambam only said that accepting money for learning would be prohibited if the Torah scholar is capable of studying diligently with a clear mind even after working for parnassah for a portion of the day. However, if the scholar is not capable of concentrating in the same way that he would be without having engaged in work, it is permissible for him to accept donations from the tzibbur. &lt;br /&gt;
Taz YD 246:7 is swayed by the concern that nowadays making parnasa for tuitions, weddings, and raising a Jewish family is really very hard. Also, Biur Halacha OC 231 says perhaps the Rambam would be modeh that it is muter if it isn&#039;t possible to learn properly and work.&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Rav Moshe (Igrot Moshe YD 2:116) says that it isn&#039;t even a midat chasidut to be stringent for the Rambam nowadays if it&#039;ll cause you to minimize your learning, since nowadays we&#039;re not capable of doing both. Rav Ovadia Yosef in Yabia Omer YD 7:17 agrees with Rav Moshe.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Maaseh Rav (sheilta 50) says Rav Chaim Volozhon was asked by an avrech if he was right in deciding to turn down a Yisachar-Zevulun opportunity because he said that he didn&#039;t want to share his spiritual reward for money. Rav Chaim said he was totally wrong. By not taking the money, he indicated that he wasn&#039;t interested in fulfilling Hashem&#039;s will; rather, he just wanted the spiritual reward. If he wanted to promote Hashem&#039;s mitzvot in a greater fashion, he would take the money so that he would be free to learn more.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#We pasken that, while it is commendable for a Torah scholar to support himself from his own earnings, it is permissible for him to accept donations to facilitate his learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rama, Yoreh Deah 246:21. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching Torah===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is also a prohibition to charge money to teach Torah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemara Bechorot 29a, Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh Deah 246:5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#However, there are several heteirim for those teaching Torah to charge money. For example, payment can certainly be accepted for any teaching position which includes disciplining children or instruction of non-Torah subjects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Beis Yosef to Yoreh Deah 246:5. See Rav Schachter’s explanation in Ginat Egoz (p. 188) where he writes that for younger grades the salary for teachers could be compensation for watching the students. For teachers of mature students, the salary could be considered a compensation to allow the teachers to have free time to learn and teach, but the actual teaching isn’t for pay. Accordingly, he writes that in his opinion, there shouldn’t be a fixed amount of sick days for rebbeim because they aren’t being paid by the day, but rather they are being paid so that they’re available to teach.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Additionally, if there is no other way for a teacher to make a parnassah, it is permissible to accept wages for Torah instruction. Even if the teacher can make a living without these wages, he can charge money for clearly evident sechar batalah (payment for the amount of money he could have earned if he was not teaching).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh Deah 246:5 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/814103/rabbi-hershel-schachter/inyonei-talmud-torah/ Inyonei Talmud Torah] by Rabbi Hershel Schachter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Learning Torah]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23240</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23240"/>
		<updated>2019-07-01T00:57:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone without permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This applies also to borrowing from a non-Jew&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without permission. Even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039;, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if you would borrow your neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake your leaves without asking him, you would be considered a thief, even if when you informed the owner he said, &amp;quot;that&#039;s fine, I do not mind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know for sure will not mind if you borrow their things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Using Someone&#039;s Land Without Permission==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Standing or walking through someone&#039;s property without permission is stealing, whether or not there is a sign posted on the land prohibiting trespassers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind, or you see that the owner has allowed a shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking Without Permission==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers, residents, employees, or any other particular group, it is prohibited for others to park there&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Also, if it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, cited in Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58, footnote 140&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, cited in Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58, footnote 141&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, cited in Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59, footnote 142&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Knowing that the Owner Will Not Mind===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Ran in the name of the Rashba in Bava Metziya 22a explains that the operative factor here is the owner&#039;s regular practice (Minhag) regarding the particular item and borrower in question. See also Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money, pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Borrowing Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a &#039;&#039;mitzvah&#039;&#039;, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzvah with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tur O.C. 14:4 explains that if someone borrows another&#039;s Tallit without permission, then there is an opinion which says that presumably a person would be happy to use their money for Mitzvot; thus, they would happily allow someone to borrow their item. The Beit Yosef O.C. 14:4 identifies this opinion with the Nimukei Yosef in Bava Batra 44b.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For Examples, see the following:&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]],&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]], and&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement about whether it is permitted to borrow someone&#039;s &#039;&#039;sefer,&#039;&#039; but many modern poskim tend towards allowing people to borrow other&#039;s &#039;&#039;seforim&#039;&#039; without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 65,  [https://torah.org/torah-portion/weekly-halacha-5773-chayeisarah/ Rabbi Doniel Neustadt], Rav Aharon Lichtenstein quoted by [https://www.koltorah.org/halachah/borrowing-without-permission-by-rabbi-howard-jachter Rabbi Chaim Jachter].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Rama 14:4 writes that it is forbidden to borrow somebody&#039;s book without their permission because it might tear while being used, Rabbi Bodner writes that in our day and age when printed seforim are abundant and inexpensive, many poskim are lenient because the owner would probably not mind. see also [https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/756926/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-borrowing-a-sefer-tallis-or-tefillin-without-permission/ Ten Minute Halacha: Borrowing a Sefer, Tallis or Tefillin Without Permission]by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When the Owner Would Object: Common Sense Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
##If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/ Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz: Using Your Roomate&#039;s Stuff Without Permission]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23239</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23239"/>
		<updated>2019-07-01T00:37:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone without permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This applies also to borrowing from a non-Jew&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without permission. Even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many &#039;&#039;poskim&#039;&#039;, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if you would borrow your neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake your leaves without asking him, you would be considered a thief, even if when you informed the owner he said, &amp;quot;that&#039;s fine, I do not mind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know for sure will not mind if you borrow their things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Using Someone&#039;s Land Without Permission ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Standing or walking through someone&#039;s property without permission is stealing, whether or not there is a sign posted on the land prohibiting trespassers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind, or you see that the owner has allowed a shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Knowing that the Owner Will Not Mind ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Ran in the name of the Rashba in Bava Metziya 22a explains that the operative factor here is the owner&#039;s regular practice (Minhag) regarding the particular item and borrower in question. See also Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money, pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Borrowing Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a &#039;&#039;mitzvah&#039;&#039;, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzvah with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tur O.C. 14:4 explains that if someone borrows another&#039;s Tallit without permission, then there is an opinion which says that presumably a person would be happy to use their money for Mitzvot; thus, they would happily allow someone to borrow their item. The Beit Yosef O.C. 14:4 identifies this opinion with the Nimukei Yosef in Bava Batra 44b.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For Examples, see the following:&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]],&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]], and&lt;br /&gt;
##[[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]. &lt;br /&gt;
###However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
####If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
####If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
####The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
####The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
####The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
####If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/ Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz: Using Your Roomate&#039;s Stuff Without Permission]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23226</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23226"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T01:38:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. &lt;br /&gt;
##For example, standing or walking through someone&#039;s property&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or parking in someone&#039;s private parking spot without permission is considered stealing whether or not there is a sign prohibiting such behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]], [[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/ Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz: Using Your Roomate&#039;s Stuff Without Permission]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23225</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23225"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T01:35:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. &lt;br /&gt;
##For example, standing or walking through someone&#039;s property&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or parking in someone&#039;s private parking spot without permission is considered stealing whether or not there is a sign prohibiting such behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]], [[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23223</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23223"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T01:35:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: /* Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. &lt;br /&gt;
##For example, standing or walking through someone&#039;s property&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or parking in someone&#039;s private parking spot without permission is considered stealing whether or not there is a sign prohibiting such behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]], [[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23221</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23221"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T01:33:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. &lt;br /&gt;
##For example, standing or walking through someone&#039;s property&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or parking in someone&#039;s private parking spot without permission is considered stealing whether or not there is a sign prohibiting such behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#There is a disagreement between &#039;&#039;Poskim&#039;&#039; about whether knowledge that the owner would not object to you borrowing his things without specific permission is sufficient justification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shach 359:1 says that you can use someone&#039;s things without specific permission if you know the owner would not mind. The Tosefot on Bava Metziya 22b disagrees. The Gemara on Bava Metziya 22b brings a story of some Amoraim who are invited by a sharecropper to eat some crops from the field he was working on. Two of the Amoraim ate with the sharecropper, but one refused. Tosefot understands that the disagreement between the Amoraim could not have been regarding whether the owner of the field would mind for them to eat from his crops, as surely all of the AMoraim would agree that it is not permitted to eat from crops without the owner&#039;s explicit permission. The Ketzot 359:1 agrees with Tosefot.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a distinction between &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;using up&amp;quot; in this context, as perhaps even the position that doesn&#039;t allow relying on implicit permission would permit using an item that would remain unchanged upon borrowing temporarily.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sefer Mishpittei HaTorah 1:52, quoted by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz in an online Shiur , &#039;Using Your Roomates Stuff Without Permission&#039; (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/924635/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/ten-minute-halacha-using-your-roomates-stuff-without-permission/).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]], [[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23214</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23214"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:49:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. &lt;br /&gt;
##For example, standing or walking through someone&#039;s property&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or parking in someone&#039;s private parking spot without permission is considered stealing whether or not there is a sign prohibiting such behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]], [[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]].&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###If the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23212</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23212"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:42:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: some grammar touch-ups&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a &#039;No Trespassing&#039; sign, or park your car in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictated that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or destruction of the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If you are certain the owner does not mind or you see that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then you may cut through his lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23211</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23211"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:39:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Minor|minor]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23210</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23210"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:38:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Non-Jew|non-Jew]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23209</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23209"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:35:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: ling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a non-Jew&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Being Careful With Other People&#039;s Money#Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend|See Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23208</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23208"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:29:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: Changed a sub-heading in the &amp;#039;Exceptions&amp;#039; section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a non-Jew&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[#Stealing_from_a_Family_Member_or_Close_Friend|see Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Items Used for Mitzvot===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23206</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23206"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: I changed the first few footnotes, edited some sentences in the &amp;#039;General&amp;#039; Section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1, also see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##If the item which you borrow without permission will not lose value when you use it, then you are not required to pay for the item until you actually proceed to use it; picking up the item is not enough to require you to pay the owner. However, if the item you borrow without permission will lose value when you use it, then your requirement to pay the owner for the use of the item is activated immediately upon lifting up the item.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch CM 292:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a non-Jew&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Mishnah Berurah 937:10 quotes the Magen Avraham A.C. 472:2 who writes that one should not build a Sukkah in a public space, as one must be certain that all the people who reside in public space would permit you to build your Sukkah there. The Magen Avraham assumes that the Jewish people of the area would be okay with it, but he assumes that the non-Jewish people would not be okay with you building your Sukkah in the public space, and thus he recommends not making the brachah on sitting in the Sukkah in such a situation. The implication is that borrowing the property from the non-Jew would be stealing.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or a minor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shulchan Aruch C.M. 348:2. [The Shulchan Aruch writes that stealing from a minor is forbidden, and borrowing from a person without permission is stealing (see footnote 1).]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without their permission is considered stealing.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[#Stealing_from_a_Family_Member_or_Close_Friend|see Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]]  for the Halachot of borrowing things from those whom you know will not mind even &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mitzva===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23203</id>
		<title>Borrowing without Permission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Borrowing_without_Permission&amp;diff=23203"/>
		<updated>2019-06-28T00:07:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yonatanf89: nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Using an item that belongs to someone else without his permission is considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rambam Gezela Vaaveda 3:15, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:5, Rama CM 308:7, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53. see  by Rabbi Dovid Grossman &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is the case even if you have intention to return it to the exact place and in the same condition that you found it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53-55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is a dispute if this is a Torah prohibition or rabbinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 53 note 128-ב &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Even using the item of a non-Jew or a minor without their permission is considered stealing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; see above for lengthier discussion about stealing from non-Jews or from children.&lt;br /&gt;
#According to many poskim, even if the owner subsequently consents and says he does not mind that the item was borrowed, since the borrower did not receive permission before he took the item, he is considered a thief. [[#Stealing_from_a_Family_Member_or_Close_Friend|see Stealing from a Family Member or Close Friend]] for the Halacha if you know the person would consent. For example, if I would borrow my neighbor&#039;s rake that he left outside to rake my leaves without asking him, I would be considered a thief, even if when I inform the owner he does not mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#This prohibition applies to land as well. For example if you would stand or walk through somebody else&#039;s property bearing a No Trespassing sign, or park in a private parking spot without the owner&#039;s permission, this would be considered stealing. Even if there is no sign, but common sense dictates that the owner would object, it may not be used without permission&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 56-57 and note 134 there citing Rav Zalman Nechemya Goldberg and Rav Elyashiv, Rashbam Bava Batra 57b s.v. lkula, Pitchei Choshen ch. 7 fnt. 29. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Cutting across the lawn or backyard of another homeowner is considered stealing, as many would object to have someone do this because of the invasion of privacy or ruining the lawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pitchei Choshen 7: note 29, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57. see there note 137 where he writes that even if you will not cause any damage, it is still forbidden &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If he is certain the owner does not mind or sees that the owner has allowed the shortcut to become established on his property, then one may cut through.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 57, Shulchan Aruch CM 377:1 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If a private parking lot has a sign restricting parking to customers or the like, it is prohibited for others to park there. If it is evident that the owner needs the lot for his customers it is prohibited to park there even without the sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If a person parks in a spot, in a manner that the owner of the parking lot would not approve of, such as blocking the entrance or exit, it is considered an act of stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#It is prohibited to block a private driveway by parking or double parking in front of the driveway, but this is not considered stealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If someone blocks your driveway, and you have tried to tell them not to park there and they continue to nevertheless, one is permitted to call the police to tow the car away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59 note 142 in the name of Rav Elyashiv. regarding damaging a double-parked car, see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/newsletter/double-parked-damage Business Halacha Institute]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Exceptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It is not considered stealing to borrow an item that will surely not be damaged from use, that nobody objects when others borrow it. For example, since nobody minds when you use their hanger, sit on their chair, or wash your hands with their washing cup, it is not considered stealing to borrow it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5 based on Ritva Baba Metzia 41a, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 59. However, he writes that if the owner is around, one should still ask permission &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, if a significant minority would object, even if not the majority, it may not be used without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S&amp;quot;A Harav Hilchot She&#039;ela Seif 5, Shu&amp;quot;t Igrot Moshe OC 5:20:5, Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Certainly, if the owner is standing there and objects to your usage, it would be stealing to use it anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60 note 145, Maharsham 227 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, if the borrower is aware of some reason that the owner might object, he may not use it without his permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If it is clear that the owner does not object, one may borrow the item without permission. For example, if in the past one regularly borrows a particular item, it indicates that the owner does not object, the person may use that type of item without asking permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mitzva===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#If an item is being borrowed to perform a mitzva, we presume that the owner does not object if it doesn&#039;t cost him anything, as people are usually pleased to have others perform a mitzva with their possessions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 61, Shulchan Aruch OC 14:4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
##see [[Details_About_the_Tefillin_Boxes_and_Straps#Borrowing_Tallit_or_Tefillin|Borrowing Tallit or Tefillin]], [[Respecting_Holy_Books#Borrowing_a_Sefer_without_Permission|Borrowing a Sefer without Permission]], [[Rosh_Hashana#Borrowing_a_Shofar_without_Permission|Borrowing a Shofar without Permission]][[Building_the_Sukkah#Using_Someone_Else.27s_Sukkah_without_their_Permission|Using Someone Else&#039;s Sukkah without their Permission]] and [[Order_of_Taking_the_Four_Minim#Borrowing_without_Permission|Borrowing Four Minim without Permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
##However, there are instances where common sense dictates that the owner would not want you to borrow his item without asking for permission:&lt;br /&gt;
###if the borrower knows that the owner would object because he is very meticulous or stingy or the like.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 62, Aruch Hashulchan 14:11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###if the owner might need it for himself, it should not be taken without permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item may not be used on a regular basis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Magen Avraham OC 14:7 and Mishna Brura 14:13, Shach CM 72:8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item should not be taken to a different place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###The item must be put back as found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 63 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
###If the owner is present, the borrower should ask permission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halachos of Other People&#039;s Money pg. 64 based on Mishna Brura 14:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ou.org/torah/halacha/business-ethics/choshen_mishpat_-_business_ethics_borrowing_without_permission/ Borrowing without Permission] by Rabbi David Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Shoel-Teachers-to-web-April-28-2013.pdf NLE Resources: Shoel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Choshen Mishpat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yonatanf89</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>