Fruits and Vegetables - Revision history

Unknown user: /* Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons */

2023-02-04T20:36:08Z

Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 4 February 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact.<ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>		# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact.<ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>
	==Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons==		==Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons==
	# Bananas are haadama.<Ref>The Gemara Brachot 40a establishes that a tree is a plant that lasts from year to year. Rosh Brachot 6:23 cites a dispute between the Tosfot and Geonim whether a tree whose branches die from year to year and regenerate from the roots is considered a tree. Tosfot hold that it is a tree since the roots regenerate the rest of the tree. That was the opinion of the Maharam. The Tur 203:2 writes that the Rosh held like the Tosfot. However, the Geonim held it isn’t a tree since the branches themselves don’t last from year to year. Shulchan Aruch 203:3 writes that bananas are haadama because of the opinion of the geonim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 and Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) agree. Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha ch. 31-2) quotes Rav Elyashiv as saying that one can recite haetz on an apple before a haadama on a banana and there's no concern since a banana is certainly haadama. Or Letzion 2:46:39 writes that haetz doesn't work for bananas at all even after the fact since ~~is like~~ the geonim to treat it as haadama completely.</ref>		# Bananas are haadama.<Ref>The Gemara Brachot 40a establishes that a tree is a plant that lasts from year to year. Rosh Brachot 6:23 cites a dispute between the Tosfot and Geonim whether a tree whose branches die from year to year and regenerate from the roots is considered a tree. Tosfot hold that it is a tree since the roots regenerate the rest of the tree. That was the opinion of the Maharam. The Tur 203:2 writes that the Rosh held like the Tosfot. However, the Geonim held it isn’t a tree since the branches themselves don’t last from year to year. Shulchan Aruch 203:3 writes that bananas are haadama because of the opinion of the geonim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 and Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) agree. Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha ch. 31-2) quotes Rav Elyashiv as saying that one can recite haetz on an apple before a haadama on a banana and there's no concern since a banana is certainly haadama. Or Letzion 2:46:39 writes that haetz doesn't work for bananas at all, even after the fact since the geonim treat it as haadama completely. Yalkut Yosef (Berachot pg.419) argues that if one accidentally he recited haetz, he has fulfilled his obligation to recite a beracha and need not recite a new one</ref>
	# If someone has ~~in front of them~~ a banana and apple one should recite a haetz on the apple first and haadama on the banana.<ref>Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) writes that since the minhag is to treat bananas as haadama they're not a doubt and one can have the apple first. Or Letzion 2:46:39 seems to agree.</ref> Some say that one should have explicit intent not to exempt the banana with the haetz.<ref>Yabia Omer 8:26:2, Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) who is concerned for this opinion. Yalkut Yosef OC 203:3 wrote that some say that one should recite the haadama on the banana and have intent not to exempt the apple, then recite haetz on the apple. </ref>		# If someone has a banana and an apple in front of him, one should recite a haetz on the apple first and haadama on the banana.<ref>Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) writes that since the minhag is to treat bananas as haadama they're not a doubt and one can have the apple first. Or Letzion 2:46:39 seems to agree.</ref> Some say that one should have explicit intent not to exempt the banana with the haetz.<ref>Yabia Omer 8:26:2, Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) who is concerned for this opinion. Yalkut Yosef OC 203:3 wrote that some say that one should recite the haadama on the banana and have intent not to exempt the apple, then recite haetz on the apple. </ref>
	# Eggplants are haadama.<ref>Birkei Yosef 203:1 and Kaf Hachaim 203:2 hold eggplant is haadama since the tree doesn't last more than three years. Vezot Habracha p. 392 agrees.</ref>		# Eggplants are haadama.<ref>Birkei Yosef 203:1 and Kaf Hachaim 203:2 hold eggplant is haadama since the tree doesn't last more than three years. Vezot Habracha p. 392 agrees.</ref>
	# Papayas are haadama as they are similar to bananas.<ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22)</ref>		# Papayas are haadama as they are similar to bananas.<ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22)</ref>

Unknown user: Text replacement - ". " to "."

2020-07-12T09:12:16Z

Text replacement - ". <ref>" to ".<ref>"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 12 July 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	# Vines and bushes are considered trees and the fruit are HaEtz if the bush grows taller than 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches). Examples of this include blueberries, grapes, and kiwis. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 394, chapter 22) </ref>		# Vines and bushes are considered trees and the fruit are HaEtz if the bush grows taller than 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches). Examples of this include blueberries, grapes, and kiwis. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 394, chapter 22) </ref>
	==HaAdama after the fact==		==HaAdama after the fact==
	# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact. <ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>		# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact.<ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>
	==Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons==		==Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons==
	# Bananas are haadama.<Ref>The Gemara Brachot 40a establishes that a tree is a plant that lasts from year to year. Rosh Brachot 6:23 cites a dispute between the Tosfot and Geonim whether a tree whose branches die from year to year and regenerate from the roots is considered a tree. Tosfot hold that it is a tree since the roots regenerate the rest of the tree. That was the opinion of the Maharam. The Tur 203:2 writes that the Rosh held like the Tosfot. However, the Geonim held it isn’t a tree since the branches themselves don’t last from year to year. Shulchan Aruch 203:3 writes that bananas are haadama because of the opinion of the geonim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 and Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) agree. Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha ch. 31-2) quotes Rav Elyashiv as saying that one can recite haetz on an apple before a haadama on a banana and there's no concern since a banana is certainly haadama. Or Letzion 2:46:39 writes that haetz doesn't work for bananas at all even after the fact since is like the geonim to treat it as haadama completely.</ref>		# Bananas are haadama.<Ref>The Gemara Brachot 40a establishes that a tree is a plant that lasts from year to year. Rosh Brachot 6:23 cites a dispute between the Tosfot and Geonim whether a tree whose branches die from year to year and regenerate from the roots is considered a tree. Tosfot hold that it is a tree since the roots regenerate the rest of the tree. That was the opinion of the Maharam. The Tur 203:2 writes that the Rosh held like the Tosfot. However, the Geonim held it isn’t a tree since the branches themselves don’t last from year to year. Shulchan Aruch 203:3 writes that bananas are haadama because of the opinion of the geonim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 and Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) agree. Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha ch. 31-2) quotes Rav Elyashiv as saying that one can recite haetz on an apple before a haadama on a banana and there's no concern since a banana is certainly haadama. Or Letzion 2:46:39 writes that haetz doesn't work for bananas at all even after the fact since is like the geonim to treat it as haadama completely.</ref>
Line 17:		Line 17:
	# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>		# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>
	# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide], [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>		# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide], [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>
	# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref> Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>		# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref> Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama.<ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>

	==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==		==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==

YitzchakSultan: /* Berries */

2018-02-27T19:27:26Z

Berries

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 27 February 2018
Line 17:		Line 17:
	# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>		# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>
	# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide], [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>		# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide], [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>
	# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>		# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref> Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>

	==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==		==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==

YitzchakSultan: /* Berries */

2018-02-27T19:27:09Z

Berries

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 27 February 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	# Strawberries are haadama.<ref>Igrot Moshe 1:86 writes that the Mishna Brurah 203:3 means that strawberries (pazimkas) are haadama since the branches die from year to year but part of the roots above the ground remain year to year. Vezot Habracha p. 402 no. 82 writes that pazimkas aren’t strawberries but strawberries are still hadama.</ref>		# Strawberries are haadama.<ref>Igrot Moshe 1:86 writes that the Mishna Brurah 203:3 means that strawberries (pazimkas) are haadama since the branches die from year to year but part of the roots above the ground remain year to year. Vezot Habracha p. 402 no. 82 writes that pazimkas aren’t strawberries but strawberries are still hadama.</ref>
	# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>		# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>
	# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref>		# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide], [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>
			# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>

	==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==		==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==
	# If one eats a fruit or vegetable in a way that is not the usual way it is eaten in that local one should make a [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>S”A 205:1 </ref>		# If one eats a fruit or vegetable in a way that is not the usual way it is eaten in that local one should make a [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>S”A 205:1 </ref>

YitzchakSultan: /* Fruit that are HaAdama */

2018-02-27T19:24:37Z

Fruit that are HaAdama

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 27 February 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==HaAdama after the fact==		==HaAdama after the fact==
	# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact. <ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>		# If one said HaAdama on bread or a Mezonit food then one fulfills his obligation to make a beracha bediavad, after the fact. <ref> Kesef Mishneh, Hilchot Berachot, 4:6 </ref>
	==~~Fruit that are HaAdama~~==		==Bananas, Eggplants, Papayas, Melons==
	# ~~A banana plant’s trunk dies yearly and so bananas~~ are ~~HaAdama~~. <Ref>~~Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) </ref>~~		# Bananas are haadama.<Ref>The Gemara Brachot 40a establishes that a tree is a plant that lasts from year to year. Rosh Brachot 6:23 cites a dispute between the Tosfot and Geonim whether a tree whose branches die from year to year and regenerate from the roots is considered a tree. Tosfot hold that it is a tree since the roots regenerate the rest of the tree. That was the opinion of the Maharam. The Tur 203:2 writes that the Rosh held like the Tosfot. However, the Geonim held it isn’t a tree since the branches themselves don’t last from year to year. Shulchan Aruch 203:3 writes that bananas are haadama because of the opinion of the geonim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 and Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) agree. Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha ch. 31-2) quotes Rav Elyashiv as saying that one can recite haetz on an apple before a haadama on a banana and there's no concern since a banana is certainly haadama. Or Letzion 2:46:39 writes that haetz doesn't work for bananas at all even after the fact since is like the geonim to treat it as haadama completely.</ref>
	~~# Raspberries~~ and ~~papaya are similar~~ to ~~bananas~~ and ~~have~~ the ~~Bracha~~ of ~~HaAdama~~. ~~<Ref>Taz 204~~:~~8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries)~~, Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg ~~395~~, chapter 22), Vezot ~~HaBrachot~~ (p. ~~401, n. 59~~). ~~The Bet Yosef 203~~:~~2 cites a dispute between~~ the ~~Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and~~ the ~~branches regenerate each year are~~ haadama and the ~~Maharam who would make Haetz since~~ the ~~branches were woody and lasted for that year~~. ~~Shulchan Aruch 203~~:2 ~~rules~~ that the ~~bracha~~ is ~~Haadama. Vezot HaBracha writes that today~~'~~s raspberry bushes~~ have ~~branches which only produce fruit in its second year, not~~ the first ~~or third~~.</ref> Some~~, however, consider raspberries~~ to ~~be HaEtz~~.<ref>~~Mishna Brurah 203~~:1 (~~מאלינע"ס means raspberries~~)~~, Aruch Hashulchan~~ 203:5, ~~[http://ou~~.~~org.s3.amazonaws.com~~/~~publications/brachot/default~~.~~htm OU Brachot Guide] [http~~:~~//ph~~.~~yhb~~.~~org~~.~~il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]~~</ref>		# If someone has in front of them a banana and apple one should recite a haetz on the apple first and haadama on the banana.<ref>Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) writes that since the minhag is to treat bananas as haadama they're not a doubt and one can have the apple first. Or Letzion 2:46:39 seems to agree.</ref> Some say that one should have explicit intent not to exempt the banana with the haetz.<ref>Yabia Omer 8:26:2, Vezot Habracha (Birur Halacha 31:2 p. 302) who is concerned for this opinion. Yalkut Yosef OC 203:3 wrote that some say that one should recite the haadama on the banana and have intent not to exempt the apple, then recite haetz on the apple. </ref>
	# ~~Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries~~. <~~Ref~~>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg ~~393~~, chapter 22)</ref>~~Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama~~. <~~ref~~> ~~Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries~~. ~~The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and~~ Halachos of [[Brachos~~]] Handbook~~ (~~p. 39~~) ~~write~~ that ~~dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries~~ are ~~Haadama (Halachos~~ of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>		# Eggplants are haadama.<ref>Birkei Yosef 203:1 and Kaf Hachaim 203:2 hold eggplant is haadama since the tree doesn't last more than three years. Vezot Habracha p. 392 agrees.</ref>
			# Papayas are haadama as they are similar to bananas.<ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22)</ref>
			# Melons are haadama.<Ref>Vezot Habracha p. 393. Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:2) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman that melons are haadama because of a doubt.</ref>

	==Berries==		==Berries==

YitzchakSultan: /* Fruits or vegetables receiving Shehakol */

2018-02-27T16:10:40Z

Fruits or vegetables receiving Shehakol

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 27 February 2018
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>		# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>

	==Fruits or ~~vegetables receiving Shehakol~~==		==Berries==
			# Blackberries are haetz.<ref>Magen Avraham 203:1 writes that blackberries are haetz. Mishna Brurah 203:3 writes that the minhag is to recite haadama on berries that grow on stalks less than 3 tefachim. Igrot Moshe 1:85 writes that blackberries in America grow on stalks larger than 3 tefachim and therefore are haetz. Anytime there's a doubt about the size of the stalk one should recite haetz. Vezot Habracha p. 389 agrees.</ref>
			# Blueberries are haetz.<Ref>Mishna Brurah 203:3 writes that the minhag is to recite haadama on berries that grow on stalks less than 3 tefachim. Vezot Habracha p. 389 writes that regular blueberries are haetz since they grow on stalks that are taller than 3 tefachim. He mentions that some wild blueberries grow on plants smaller than 3 tefachim.</ref>
			# Strawberries are haadama.<ref>Igrot Moshe 1:86 writes that the Mishna Brurah 203:3 means that strawberries (pazimkas) are haadama since the branches die from year to year but part of the roots above the ground remain year to year. Vezot Habracha p. 402 no. 82 writes that pazimkas aren’t strawberries but strawberries are still hadama.</ref>
			# Cranberries are haadama.<Ref>Halachos of Brachos (Teshuvot 203:1) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that cranberries are haadama since the stalk is less than 3 tefachim. That is his conclusion on p. 394. Vezot Habracha p. 391 agrees. Rav Elyashiv (cited by Darshu 203:8 from Yisa Yosef 3:50) held it was haetz since they're edible.</ref>
			# Raspberries are haadama.<Ref>Vezot Habracha p. 395 writes that raspberries are haadama. He explains that the branches last three years but only produce fruit in the second year.</ref>
			==Eating Raw Fruits or Vegetables==
	# If one eats a fruit or vegetable in a way that is not the usual way it is eaten in that local one should make a [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>S”A 205:1 </ref>		# If one eats a fruit or vegetable in a way that is not the usual way it is eaten in that local one should make a [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>S”A 205:1 </ref>
	# Examples include eating quince, onions (outside of salad), or peanuts raw requires [[Shehakol]] and eating melon, cucumbers, lettuce, radishes, or walnuts cooked requires [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 398-9, chapter 22) </ref>		# Examples include eating quince, onions (outside of salad), or peanuts raw requires [[Shehakol]] and eating melon, cucumbers, lettuce, radishes, or walnuts cooked requires [[Shehakol]]. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 398-9, chapter 22) </ref>
	# If a fruit or vegetable is usually eaten raw and cooked then the regular Bracha applies. <Ref>~~S”A~~ 202:12 </ref>		# If a fruit or vegetable is usually eaten raw and cooked then the regular Bracha applies. <Ref>Shulchan Aruch 202:12 </ref>
	# Examples include almond, apples, tomatoes, and carrots which are eaten raw and cooked. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 399-401, chapter 22) </ref>		# Examples include almond, apples, tomatoes, and carrots which are eaten raw and cooked. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 399-401, chapter 22) </ref>

Dlhanon at 00:27, 5 December 2017

2017-12-05T00:27:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 5 December 2017
Line 118:		Line 118:
	</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
			</tr><tr> <td> Orange Peel (Candied) </td> <td> Shehakol שהכל <ref>Mishnah Berurah 202:39. The Taz (OC 204:15) writes that one should recite Ha’odama, since the Gemara writes that on the peel of the fruit of the caper bush one recites Ha’odama. The Taz maintains that the same holds true for other peels as well. The Magen Avrohom (202:17) writes that one should recite Ha’eitz. Unlike the peel of the caper which separates from the fruit while it grows, the orange peel is part of the fruit. The Pri Megadim (202:17) writes that the bracha is Shehakol. He explains that the ikar (main ingredient) in candied orange peels is the sugar or honey, which is Shehakol. The Mishna Brura concludes that since we are not sure which beracha to recite, one should recite Shehakol</ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>

Dlhanon: Reverted edits by Dlhanon (talk) to last revision by BinyominZeev

2017-12-05T00:22:25Z

Reverted edits by Dlhanon (talk) to last revision by BinyominZeev

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 5 December 2017
Line 117:		Line 117:
	</tr><tr> <td> Nectarine </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Nectarine </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> Shehakol <ref>Mishnah Berurah 202:39. The Taz (OC 204:15) writes that one should recite Ha’odama, since the Gemara writes that on the peel of the fruit of the caper bush one recites Ha’odama. The Taz maintains that the same holds true for other peels as well. The Magen Avrohom (202:17) writes that one should recite Ha’eitz. Unlike the peel of the caper which separates from the fruit while it grows, the orange peel is part of the fruit. The Pri Megadim (202:17) writes that the bracha is Shehakol. He explains that the ikar (main ingredient) in candied orange peels is the sugar or honey, which is Shehakol. Thus, Mishna Berura concludes that since we are not sure which one to recite,		</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	~~one should recite Shehakol</ref> </td> </tr><tr>~~
	~~</tr><tr> <td> Candied Orange Peels~~</td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>

Dlhanon at 00:21, 5 December 2017

2017-12-05T00:21:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 5 December 2017
Line 117:		Line 117:
	</tr><tr> <td> Nectarine </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Nectarine </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Olive </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Orange </td> <td> Shehakol <ref>Mishnah Berurah 202:39. The Taz (OC 204:15) writes that one should recite Ha’odama, since the Gemara writes that on the peel of the fruit of the caper bush one recites Ha’odama. The Taz maintains that the same holds true for other peels as well. The Magen Avrohom (202:17) writes that one should recite Ha’eitz. Unlike the peel of the caper which separates from the fruit while it grows, the orange peel is part of the fruit. The Pri Megadim (202:17) writes that the bracha is Shehakol. He explains that the ikar (main ingredient) in candied orange peels is the sugar or honey, which is Shehakol. Thus, Mishna Berura concludes that since we are not sure which one to recite,
			one should recite Shehakol</ref> </td> </tr><tr>
			</tr><tr> <td> Candied Orange Peels</td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Passion fruit </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>
	</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>		</tr><tr> <td> Peach </td> <td> HaEtz העץ <ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 396, chapter 22) </ref> </td> </tr><tr>

BinyominZeev: /* Fruit that are HaAdama */

2017-03-06T09:31:13Z

Fruit that are HaAdama

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 6 March 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Fruit that are HaAdama==		==Fruit that are HaAdama==
	# A banana plant’s trunk dies yearly and so bananas are HaAdama. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) </ref>		# A banana plant’s trunk dies yearly and so bananas are HaAdama. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22) </ref>
	# Raspberries and papaya are similar to bananas and have the Bracha of HaAdama. <Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot HaBracha writes that today's raspberry bushes have branches which only produce fruit in its second year, not the first or third.</ref> Some, however, consider ~~rasberries~~ to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide] [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>		# Raspberries and papaya are similar to bananas and have the Bracha of HaAdama. <Ref>Taz 204:8 (יאגדי"ש מלונ"ש means raspberries), Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 395, chapter 22), Vezot HaBrachot (p. 401, n. 59). The Bet Yosef 203:2 cites a dispute between the Geonim who say that berries that grow on bushes which die and the branches regenerate each year are haadama and the Maharam who would make Haetz since the branches were woody and lasted for that year. Shulchan Aruch 203:2 rules that the bracha is Haadama. Vezot HaBracha writes that today's raspberry bushes have branches which only produce fruit in its second year, not the first or third.</ref> Some, however, consider raspberries to be HaEtz.<ref>Mishna Brurah 203:1 (מאלינע"ס means raspberries), Aruch Hashulchan 203:5, [http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/brachot/default.htm OU Brachot Guide] [http://ph.yhb.org.il/10-08-02/ Peninei Halacha]</ref>
	# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>		# Bushes which grow within 3 [[Tefachim]] (9 inches) of the ground have the Bracha of HaAdama. Examples of this include cranberries and wild blueberries. <Ref>Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22)</ref>Accordingly, craisins would be Haadama. <ref> Additionally, Craisins are just dried cranberries. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 359-384) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] Handbook (p. 39) write that dried fruit is the same as regular fruit for hilchot [[brachos]]. Since cranberries are Haadama (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 393, chapter 22), craisins should be Haadama. [http://www.hakhel.info/archivesCABs/HAKHELCOMMUNITYAWARENESSBULLETIN9.pdf A Community Awareness Bulletin Tishrei 5763] also writes that craisins are the same as cranberries, which according to the Halachos of [[Brachos]] is Haadama.</ref>