Hadasim - Revision history

Unknown user: Text replacement - ". " to "."

2020-07-13T07:09:52Z

Text replacement - ". <ref>" to ".<ref>"

YitzchakSultan: Text replacement - "S"A" to "Shulchan Aruch"

2015-01-07T03:03:20Z

Text replacement - "S"A" to "Shulchan Aruch"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 7 January 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
	# A Hadas that has more berries, whether they are red or black, than leaves is invalid.<ref>~~S"A~~ 646:2</ref>		# A Hadas that has more berries, whether they are red or black, than leaves is invalid.<ref>Shulchan Aruch 646:2</ref>
	\|[[Image:Hadas With Berries.gif\|125px\|right]]		\|[[Image:Hadas With Berries.gif\|125px\|right]]
	\|}		\|}

YitzchakSultan: /* General Laws */

2014-07-15T17:41:03Z

General Laws

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 15 July 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
	# A Hadas that has more berries, whether they are red or black, than leaves is invalid.<ref>S"A 646:2</ref>		# A Hadas that has more berries, whether they are red or black, than leaves is invalid.<ref>S"A 646:2</ref>
			\|[[Image:Hadas With Berries.gif\|125px\|right]]
	\|}		\|}
	~~[[Image:Hadas With Berries.gif\|200px\|right]]~~

	==Which Hadasim are best?==		==Which Hadasim are best?==

YitzchakSultan: /* General Laws */

2014-07-15T17:38:06Z

General Laws

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 15 July 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
			# A Hadas that has more berries, whether they are red or black, than leaves is invalid.<ref>S"A 646:2</ref>
	\|}		\|}
			[[Image:Hadas With Berries.gif\|200px\|right]]

	==Which Hadasim are best?==		==Which Hadasim are best?==
	# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

YitzchakSultan: /* Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it? */

2014-07-04T22:14:01Z

Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 4 July 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:
	# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a [[hadas]] has large, wide leaves it is a [[hadas]] shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a [[hadas]] has large, wide leaves it is a [[hadas]] shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==		==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==
	# If the tip of the stem of the [[hadas]] was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it.Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If the tip of the stem of the [[hadas]] was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it. Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

	==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==		==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==
	# According to Maran, a [[hadas]] must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a [[hadas]] is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# According to Maran, a [[hadas]] must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a [[hadas]] is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

YitzchakSultan: Text replace - "ibid" to "{{ibid}}"

2014-02-09T01:44:08Z

Text replace - "ibid" to "{{ibid}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 9 February 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:
	# The [[hadas]] should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. According to the Talmud, the [[hadas]] must be meshulash. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]		# The [[hadas]] should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. According to the Talmud, the [[hadas]] must be meshulash. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]
	* The Gemara (32b) considers a [[hadas]] with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a [[hadas]] shoteh, or “unstable” [[hadas]]. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the [[hadas]].		* The Gemara (32b) considers a [[hadas]] with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a [[hadas]] shoteh, or “unstable” [[hadas]]. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the [[hadas]].
	* Halichot Shlomo (ibid.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter (ibid.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the [[hadas]] at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>		* Halichot Shlomo ({{ibid}}.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter ({{ibid}}.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the [[hadas]] at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>
	# Therefore, a [[hadas]] that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a [[hadas]] is invalid.</Ref>		# Therefore, a [[hadas]] that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a [[hadas]] is invalid.</Ref>
	# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the [[hadas]] is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the [[hadas]]; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a [[hadas]] branch. Thus, since the [[hadas]] should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the [[hadas]] is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].		# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the [[hadas]] is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the [[hadas]]; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a [[hadas]] branch. Thus, since the [[hadas]] should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the [[hadas]] is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah (ibid.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
	\|}		\|}

Dlhanon at 05:42, 26 January 2014

2014-01-26T05:42:01Z

YitzchakSultan at 01:29, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T01:29:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 18 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Hadasim.png\|100px\|right]]		[[Image:Hadasim.png\|100px\|right]]
	~~==What are Hadasim?==~~		In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals.
	~~[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|75px\|left]]~~		==General Laws==
	# In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. according to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. However, it is not necessary that each of the three petioles grows at exactly the same level. It is sufficient if at least art of each of the three petioles meets the stem at the same level. For example, if each petiole is 2 millimeters in diameter, and one petiole is 1 millimeter higher than the second one and almost 2 millimeters higher than the third, the three leaves are considered to be growing at the same level. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 1. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		{\|
	~~# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 2. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim~~: ~~HaKeter Institute, 2010~~. ~~</ref>~~		\|[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|75px\|left]]
			\|
	# One should use three hadasim for the mitzvah. Each hadas should be at least 3 [[Tefachim]] in length. <Ref>Rambam (7:7) and Shulchan Aruch (651:1) rule in accordance with Rabbi Yishmael, who requires three hadasim and two aravot. The Rama adds that in extenuating circumstances, one may use just one hadas. Regarding their sizes, Shulchan Aruch (650:1) rules like Tosfot that the minimum size for both hadasim and aravot is 10 [[etzba’ot]]; however, he also mentions the Rif’s opinion of 12 [[etzba’ot]] (see note 3). </Ref>		# One should use three hadasim for the mitzvah. Each hadas should be at least 3 [[Tefachim]] in length. <Ref>Rambam (7:7) and Shulchan Aruch (651:1) rule in accordance with Rabbi Yishmael, who requires three hadasim and two aravot. The Rama adds that in extenuating circumstances, one may use just one hadas. Regarding their sizes, Shulchan Aruch (650:1) rules like Tosfot that the minimum size for both hadasim and aravot is 10 [[etzba’ot]]; however, he also mentions the Rif’s opinion of 12 [[etzba’ot]] (see note 3). </Ref>
	# The hadas should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]		# The hadas should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. According to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]
	* The Gemara (32b) considers a hadas with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a hadas shoteh, or “unstable” hadas. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the hadas.		* The Gemara (32b) considers a hadas with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a hadas shoteh, or “unstable” hadas. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the hadas.
	* Halichot Shlomo (ibid.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter (ibid.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the hadas at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.		* Halichot Shlomo (ibid.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter (ibid.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the hadas at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>
	* The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a hadas is invalid.</Ref>		# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a hadas is invalid.</Ref>
	# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the hadas is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the hadas; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a hadas branch. Thus, since the hadas should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the hadas is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].		# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the hadas is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the hadas; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a hadas branch. Thus, since the hadas should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the hadas is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the hadas, Mishna Brurah (ibid.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the hadas, Mishna Brurah (ibid.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the hadas is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the hadas remain, the hadas is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s hadas is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the hadas, the hadas is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the hadas to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the hadas is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the hadas remain, the hadas is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s hadas is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the hadas, the hadas is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the hadas to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
			\|}
	==Which Hadasim are best?==		==Which Hadasim are best?==
	# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

YitzchakSultan at 01:17, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T01:17:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 18 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Hadasim.png\|right~~\|200px~~]]		[[Image:Hadasim.png\|100px\|right]]
	==What are Hadasim?==		==What are Hadasim?==
	[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|~~300px~~\|~~right~~]]		[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|75px\|left]]
	# In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. according to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. However, it is not necessary that each of the three petioles grows at exactly the same level. It is sufficient if at least art of each of the three petioles meets the stem at the same level. For example, if each petiole is 2 millimeters in diameter, and one petiole is 1 millimeter higher than the second one and almost 2 millimeters higher than the third, the three leaves are considered to be growing at the same level. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 1. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. according to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. However, it is not necessary that each of the three petioles grows at exactly the same level. It is sufficient if at least art of each of the three petioles meets the stem at the same level. For example, if each petiole is 2 millimeters in diameter, and one petiole is 1 millimeter higher than the second one and almost 2 millimeters higher than the third, the three leaves are considered to be growing at the same level. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 1. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 2. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 2. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

YitzchakSultan at 01:15, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T01:15:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 18 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Image:Hadasim.png\|right\|200px]]
	==What are Hadasim?==		==What are Hadasim?==
			[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|300px\|right]]
	# In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. according to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. However, it is not necessary that each of the three petioles grows at exactly the same level. It is sufficient if at least art of each of the three petioles meets the stem at the same level. For example, if each petiole is 2 millimeters in diameter, and one petiole is 1 millimeter higher than the second one and almost 2 millimeters higher than the third, the three leaves are considered to be growing at the same level. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 1. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. according to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. However, it is not necessary that each of the three petioles grows at exactly the same level. It is sufficient if at least art of each of the three petioles meets the stem at the same level. For example, if each petiole is 2 millimeters in diameter, and one petiole is 1 millimeter higher than the second one and almost 2 millimeters higher than the third, the three leaves are considered to be growing at the same level. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 1. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 2. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 2. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 13 July 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The Gemara (32b) considers a [[hadas]] with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a [[hadas]] shoteh, or “unstable” [[hadas]]. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the [[hadas]].		* The Gemara (32b) considers a [[hadas]] with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a [[hadas]] shoteh, or “unstable” [[hadas]]. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the [[hadas]].
	* Halichot Shlomo ({{ibid}}.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter ({{ibid}}.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the [[hadas]] at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>		* Halichot Shlomo ({{ibid}}.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter ({{ibid}}.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the [[hadas]] at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>
	# Therefore, a [[hadas]] that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a [[hadas]] is invalid.</Ref>		# Therefore, a [[hadas]] that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah.<ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a [[hadas]] is invalid.</Ref>
	# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the [[hadas]] is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the [[hadas]]; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a [[hadas]] branch. Thus, since the [[hadas]] should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the [[hadas]] is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].		# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the [[hadas]] is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the [[hadas]]; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a [[hadas]] branch. Thus, since the [[hadas]] should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the [[hadas]] is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah ({{ibid}}.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Which Hadasim are best?==		==Which Hadasim are best?==
	# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==How big are the leaves of Hadasim?==		==How big are the leaves of Hadasim?==
	# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a [[hadas]] has large, wide leaves it is a [[hadas]] shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a [[hadas]] has large, wide leaves it is a [[hadas]] shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==		==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==
	# If the tip of the stem of the [[hadas]] was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it. Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If the tip of the stem of the [[hadas]] was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it. Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

	==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==		==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==
	# According to Maran, a [[hadas]] must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a [[hadas]] is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# According to Maran, a [[hadas]] must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a [[hadas]] is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==What if the leaves of the hadasim are dry?==		==What if the leaves of the hadasim are dry?==
	# If most of the leaves of someone's hadasim have become completely dry but at least one set of three leaves at the top of each [[hadas]] is still fresh, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 13. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If most of the leaves of someone's hadasim have become completely dry but at least one set of three leaves at the top of each [[hadas]] is still fresh, the hadasim are still kosher.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 13. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==What if the leaves of the hadasim have withered?==		==What if the leaves of the hadasim have withered?==
	# If the leaves of the hadasim have withered, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 14. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If the leaves of the hadasim have withered, the hadasim are still kosher.<ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 14. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 26 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Hadasim.png\|100px\|right]]		[[Image:Hadasim.png\|100px\|right]]
	In reference to the triple-leaved hadas the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals.		In reference to the triple-leaved [[hadas]] the Torah states "a thickly-leaved branch." Its leaves hide its stem, and the leaves grow in a formation along the stem, with clusters of three parallel leaves growing, each from its own petiole, around the stem at short intervals.
	==General Laws==		==General Laws==
	{\|		{\|
	\|[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|75px\|left]]		\|[[Image:Meshulash2.png\|75px\|left]]
	\|		\|
	# One should use three hadasim for the mitzvah. Each hadas should be at least 3 [[Tefachim]] in length. <Ref>Rambam (7:7) and Shulchan Aruch (651:1) rule in accordance with Rabbi Yishmael, who requires three hadasim and two aravot. The Rama adds that in extenuating circumstances, one may use just one hadas. Regarding their sizes, Shulchan Aruch (650:1) rules like Tosfot that the minimum size for both hadasim and aravot is 10 [[etzba’ot]]; however, he also mentions the Rif’s opinion of 12 [[etzba’ot]] (see note 3). </Ref>		# One should use three hadasim for the mitzvah. Each [[hadas]] should be at least 3 [[Tefachim]] in length. <Ref>Rambam (7:7) and Shulchan Aruch (651:1) rule in accordance with Rabbi Yishmael, who requires three hadasim and two [[aravot]]. The Rama adds that in extenuating circumstances, one may use just one [[hadas]]. Regarding their sizes, Shulchan Aruch (650:1) rules like Tosfot that the minimum size for both hadasim and [[aravot]] is 10 [[etzba’ot]]; however, he also mentions the Rif’s opinion of 12 [[etzba’ot]] (see note 3). </Ref>
	# The hadas should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. According to the Talmud, the hadas must be meshulash. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]		# The [[hadas]] should have rows of three leaves spanning the length of the branch. The feature of each cluster of leaves growing from one level along the branch's stem, is imperative for the mitzvah because the branch is invalid without it. According to the Talmud, the [[hadas]] must be meshulash. One can check for these rows at arm’s length. <Ref> [[Image:HadasimMeshulash.png\|right\|75px]]
	* The Gemara (32b) considers a hadas with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a hadas shoteh, or “unstable” hadas. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the hadas.		* The Gemara (32b) considers a [[hadas]] with rows of two leaves and one leaf on top to be a [[hadas]] shoteh, or “unstable” [[hadas]]. The Gemara understands the requirement for rows of three leaves (meshulashim) to be the explanation of “avot,” the Torah’s description of the [[hadas]].
	* Halichot Shlomo (ibid.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter (ibid.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the hadas at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>		* Halichot Shlomo (ibid.) rules that the determining factor for meshulashim is the location of the stems of the leaves. Additionally, he explains that a row of leaves is considered meshulash if the three stems are in close proximity such that it would be possible to draw a horizontal circumference of the branch that would intersect with all three stems (see diagram). Rav Yigal Ariel (Techumin 11:177) understands that it is sufficient if the leaves are roughly in rows of three and do not blatantly deviate from rows. Rav Chaim Jachter (ibid.) notes that the common practice of some gedolim was to analyze the [[hadas]] at arm’s length to make this determination. Yalkut Yosef (646:8) rules that ideally the leaves should cover the entire branch.</ref>
	# Therefore, a hadas that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a hadas is invalid.</Ref>		# Therefore, a [[hadas]] that has only two leaves growing at each level on its stem is invalid for the mitzvah. <ref>The Rama (646:3) quotes a minhag to be lenient if there are two leaves above another two leaves, though the Mishna Brurah (646:15) rules that one should ideally not rely on this minhag. Yalkut Yosef (646:2) writes that such a [[hadas]] is invalid.</Ref>
	# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the hadas is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the hadas; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a hadas branch. Thus, since the hadas should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the hadas is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].		# If leaves fell off such that rows of three leaves cover only a majority of the branch (or a majority of the length requirement for the mitzvah if one has a long branch), the [[hadas]] is acceptable. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:5) rules that one ideally should have the leaves be in rows of three for the entire length of the [[hadas]]; nevertheless, one fulfills his obligation if the leaves are in rows of three for the majority of the branch. Mishna Brurah (646:18) states that this majority refers to a majority of the minimum size of a [[hadas]] branch. Thus, since the [[hadas]] should be 12 [[etzba’ot]], a majority would only require no more than 6 [[etzba’ot]], even if the [[hadas]] is larger than its necessary 12 [[etzba’ot]].
	* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the hadas, Mishna Brurah (ibid.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>		* If only two leaves remain in each row for a majority of the [[hadas]], Mishna Brurah (ibid.) rules that one may be lenient in extenuating circumstances. </Ref>
	# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the hadas is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the hadas remain, the hadas is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s hadas is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the hadas, the hadas is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the hadas to retain its status of hadar.</ref>		# If the leaves become dry to the point where they easily wither away when one presses a fingernail to them and they lose their green color, the [[hadas]] is pasul. If, however, three green leaves in a row at the top of the [[hadas]] remain, the [[hadas]] is valid. <Ref> Shulchan Aruch (646:7) explains that for the leaves to be considered dry, they must have turned white. Mishna Brurah (646:20) notes that if they have turned white, they certainly will wither when touched. If it is difficult to determine whether one’s [[hadas]] is dry, Mishna Brurah says that one can test it by putting it in water for a day or two and checking to see if it returns to its initial moist state. Shulchan Aruch (646:8) notes that if three moist leaves remain in a row at the top of the [[hadas]], the [[hadas]] is valid. Mishna Brurah (646:21) explains that having three leaves on top allows the [[hadas]] to retain its status of hadar.</ref>
	\|}		\|}
	==Which Hadasim are best?==		==Which Hadasim are best?==
	# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# It is best to choose hadasim that have many leaves close together so that the stem is completely covered by the leaves. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 3. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==How big are the leaves of Hadasim?==		==How big are the leaves of Hadasim?==
	# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a hadas has large, wide leaves it is a hadas shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# The individual leaves of the hadasim should be approximately the size of the thumbnail. Some Poskim rule that if a [[hadas]] has large, wide leaves it is a [[hadas]] shote and is invalid for the performance of the mitzvah. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 4. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==		==Does a severed tip of a hadas invalidate it?==
	# If the tip of the stem of the hadas was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it.Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If the tip of the stem of the [[hadas]] was broken or cut off it is still kosher and one may recite the beracha over it.Nevertheless, it is best that hadasim have their tips intact. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 5. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==		==What is the minimum length of a hadas?==
	# According to Maran, a hadas must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a hadas is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# According to Maran, a [[hadas]] must be at least three [[Tefachim]] or 20 centimeters long. However, other poskim maintain that the minimum length of a [[hadas]] is 24 centimeters. It is recommended that one choose hadasim that are at least 24 centimeters long in order to fulfill the mitzvah according to all poskim. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 7. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==What if the leaves of the hadasim are dry?==		==What if the leaves of the hadasim are dry?==
	# If most of the leaves of someone's hadasim have become completely dry but at least one set of three leaves at the top of each hadas is still fresh, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 13. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If most of the leaves of someone's hadasim have become completely dry but at least one set of three leaves at the top of each [[hadas]] is still fresh, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 13. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
	==What if the leaves of the hadasim have withered?==		==What if the leaves of the hadasim have withered?==
	# If the leaves of the hadasim have withered, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 14. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>		# If the leaves of the hadasim have withered, the hadasim are still kosher. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 646, Seif 14. Givat Shaul, Yerushalayim: HaKeter Institute, 2010. </ref>
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>
			[[Category:Holidays]]
			[[Category:Sukkot]]