Wheat and Grain Products - Revision history

Dlhanon: /* The five grains (wheat, barley…) */

2024-07-21T19:28:46Z

The five grains (wheat, barley…)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 21 July 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses these approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.		*What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses these approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 69-72) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which ~~Cherrios~~ used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.		*[http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 69-72) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cheerios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.
	* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.		*Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.
	* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 36b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash Pesachim 36b, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, Yerushalmi Challah 1:1 (according to Maharach Or Zaruah 218 and Peni Moshe s.v. ein) , and Tur OC 208:1. </ref>		*However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 36b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash Pesachim 36b, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, Yerushalmi Challah 1:1 (according to Maharach Or Zaruah 218 and Peni Moshe s.v. ein) , and Tur OC 208:1.</ref>
	# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]].<ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>		# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]].<ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>

Unknown user: /* The five grains (wheat, barley…) */

2022-03-31T22:06:22Z

The five grains (wheat, barley…)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 31 March 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses ~~this~~ approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.		* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses these approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 69-72) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.
	* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.		* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.
	* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 36b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash Pesachim 36b, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, Yerushalmi Challah 1:1 (according to Maharach Or Zaruah 218 and Peni Moshe s.v. ein) , and Tur OC 208:1. </ref>		* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 36b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash Pesachim 36b, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, Yerushalmi Challah 1:1 (according to Maharach Or Zaruah 218 and Peni Moshe s.v. ein) , and Tur OC 208:1. </ref>

Unknown user: /* The five grains (wheat, barley…) */

2021-06-28T16:15:11Z

The five grains (wheat, barley…)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 28 June 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.
	* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.		* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.
	* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim ~~35b~~ according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, and Tur 208:1.</ref>		* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 36b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash Pesachim 36b, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, Yerushalmi Challah 1:1 (according to Maharach Or Zaruah 218 and Peni Moshe s.v. ein) , and Tur OC 208:1. </ref>
	# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]].<ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>		# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]].<ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>

Unknown user: /* The five grains (wheat, barley…) */

2021-03-09T20:50:11Z

The five grains (wheat, barley…)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 9 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==		==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses this approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.		* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses this approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.</ref>		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.
	# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]]. <ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>		* Are shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin shivat haminim? This has applications for bikkurim and reciting al peroteha. Yerushalmi Brachot 6:1 at the end and Tosefta Brachot 4 imply that they're not shivat haminim. Hagahot Maimoniyot Brachot 8:300 cited by Bet Yosef 211:6 also implies this. Peni Yehoshua Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey and Brachot 35a s.v ma says so explicitly. Tzlach 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey agrees. Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Bikkurim 1:3 cites the Peni Yehoshua. Derech Emunah Bikurim 1:19 rules like the Peni Yehoshua. Meromei Sadeh Brachot 44a s.v. vha assumes like the Peni Yehoshua.
			* However, Magen Avraham 168:6, Madanei Yom Tov on Rosh Brachot 6:21:300, Aguda Brachot ch. 6 n. 149 all answer that it is indeed part of the shivat haminim but the Tosefta means that it isn't explicit in the pasuk. Those who hold that shibolet shual, shifon, and kusmin are shivat haminim: Tosfot Pesachim 35b according to the Maharsha, Rashash Pesachim 36b s.v. tos s.v. otzey, Or Chadash, Tosfot Harash Pesachim 36b s.v. otzey, Tosfot Harosh 36b, Rabbenu Dovid 36b s.v. otzey, Chiddushei Haran 36b s.v. otzey, and Tur 208:1.</ref>
			# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]].<ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>

	==General rule==		==General rule==

Unknown user: /* The five grains (wheat, barley…) */

2021-02-25T04:55:00Z

The five grains (wheat, barley…)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 25 February 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value.		* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value. Rabbi Efrati (Mesorah v. 10 p. 66) endorses this approaches and addresses the questions about the identification of oats as shibolet shual.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios ~~are~~ made) have a ~~siginificant~~ amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. </ref>		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios used to be made) have a significant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. Rav Willig in Am Mordechai Brachot agrees.</ref>
	# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]]. <ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>		# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]]. <ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>

Kperlitsh at 16:10, 4 March 2016

2016-03-04T16:10:02Z

Kperlitsh at 16:04, 4 March 2016

2016-03-04T16:04:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 4 March 2016
Line 19:		Line 19:

	==If one eats a grain product as a meal==		==If one eats a grain product as a meal==
	# There are two types of grain products that require [[mezonot]]. If a grain was ground up and then made into a cooked dish (Tavshil [[Mezonot]]) such as oatmeal or a baked good ([[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]]) such as cake, the appropriate Bracha would be [[Mezonot]]. However, a cooked dish requires [[Mezonot]] even if one establishes it into a meal <ref>S”A 208:2 </ref> whereas [[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]] requires [[Mezonot]] if eaten as a snack, but [[HaMotzei]] if established as a meal. See further details at [[Making a meal on Mezonot]] </ref> S”A 168:6 </ref>		# There are two types of grain products that require [[mezonot]]. If a grain was ground up and then made into a cooked dish (Tavshil [[Mezonot]]) such as oatmeal or a baked good ([[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]]) such as cake, the appropriate Bracha would be [[Mezonot]]. However, a cooked dish requires [[Mezonot]] even if one establishes it into a meal <ref>S”A 208:2 </ref> whereas [[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]] requires [[Mezonot]] if eaten as a snack, but [[HaMotzei]] if established as a meal. See further details at [[Making a meal on Mezonot]] <ref> S”A 168:6 </ref>

	==Noodles==		==Noodles==

YitzchakSultan: Text replacement - "S"A" to "Shulchan Aruch"

2015-01-07T03:09:04Z

Text replacement - "S"A" to "Shulchan Aruch"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 7 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==		==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. ~~S"A~~ 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref>		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref>
	* The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		* The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==General rule==		==General rule==
	# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the [[Bracha Achrona]] is [[Al HaMichya]]. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>		# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the [[Bracha Achrona]] is [[Al HaMichya]]. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>
	* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif ([[Brachot]] 26a), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and ~~S"A~~ 208:2.		* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif ([[Brachot]] 26a), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and Shulchan Aruch 208:2.
	* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. Moreover, the Rashba ([[Brachot]] 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.		* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. Moreover, the Rashba ([[Brachot]] 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.
	* Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>		* Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>
Line 25:		Line 25:

	==Oatmeal and farina==		==Oatmeal and farina==
	# Hot cereals made from the five grains, farina, and oatmeal have [[Bracha Rishona]] of [[Mezonot]] and [[Bracha Achrona]] of [[Al HaMichya]] (even if one makes a meal out of it) <ref>The Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b records that everyone agrees that Daysa is [[Mezonot]]. Rashi (s.v. Daysa) explains that Daysa is (a cooked dish) made from crushed up wheat. This ruling is implied from the Rif ([[Brachot]] 25b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and ~~S"A~~ 208:2. Therefore, The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 272) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Bodner, chap 27, pg 532, and [[Brachos]] handbook pg 64) rule that oatmeal and farina is [[Mezonot]] and [[Al HaMichya]]. Halachos of [[Brachos]] adds that even if one makes a meal (Koveh Seuda) out of oatmeal the bracha is still [[Mezonot]]. </ref> unless it is made with a watery consistency. <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that hot cereal which are made out of the five grains is [[Mezonot]] unless it is very thin and watery. This is also the ruling of Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 107) that oatmeal cereal is [[mezonot]] unless it's very thin and pours like a liquid (he adds that if one pushes the grain to one side of the bowl and it remains there as a clump and doesn't spread out right away it's considered a food and not a drink). </ref>		# Hot cereals made from the five grains, farina, and oatmeal have [[Bracha Rishona]] of [[Mezonot]] and [[Bracha Achrona]] of [[Al HaMichya]] (even if one makes a meal out of it) <ref>The Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b records that everyone agrees that Daysa is [[Mezonot]]. Rashi (s.v. Daysa) explains that Daysa is (a cooked dish) made from crushed up wheat. This ruling is implied from the Rif ([[Brachot]] 25b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and Shulchan Aruch 208:2. Therefore, The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 272) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Bodner, chap 27, pg 532, and [[Brachos]] handbook pg 64) rule that oatmeal and farina is [[Mezonot]] and [[Al HaMichya]]. Halachos of [[Brachos]] adds that even if one makes a meal (Koveh Seuda) out of oatmeal the bracha is still [[Mezonot]]. </ref> unless it is made with a watery consistency. <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that hot cereal which are made out of the five grains is [[Mezonot]] unless it is very thin and watery. This is also the ruling of Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 107) that oatmeal cereal is [[mezonot]] unless it's very thin and pours like a liquid (he adds that if one pushes the grain to one side of the bowl and it remains there as a clump and doesn't spread out right away it's considered a food and not a drink). </ref>

	==Licorice==		==Licorice==

Dlhanon at 17:05, 23 March 2014

2014-03-23T17:05:34Z

YitzchakSultan: YitzchakSultan moved page Wheat and grain products to Wheat and Grain Products

2014-01-26T01:14:25Z

YitzchakSultan moved page Wheat and grain products to Wheat and Grain Products

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:14, 26 January 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 4 March 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==		==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. Shulchan Aruch 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref>		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref> The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value.		* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios are made) have a siginificant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. </ref>		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios are made) have a siginificant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. </ref>
Line 8:		Line 7:

	==General rule==		==General rule==
	# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the [[Bracha Achrona]] is [[Al HaMichya]]. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>		# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the [[Bracha Achrona]] is [[Al HaMichya]]. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref> In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif ([[Brachot]] 26a), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and Shulchan Aruch 208:2.
	* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif ([[Brachot]] 26a), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and Shulchan Aruch 208:2.
	* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. Moreover, the Rashba ([[Brachot]] 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.		* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. Moreover, the Rashba ([[Brachot]] 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.
	* Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>		* Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>
	# The major exception to the above rule is when the grain flour is added only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food (and not [[Mezonot]] because of the flour). <Ref>		# The major exception to the above rule is when the grain flour is added only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food (and not [[Mezonot]] because of the flour). <Ref> In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. However, on Gemara [[Brachot]] 39a Rav Huna states that a cooked dish made out of beets and flour is HaAdama because the flour added was only meant to bind the food together.
	* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. However, on Gemara [[Brachot]] 39a Rav Huna states that a cooked dish made out of beets and flour is HaAdama because the flour added was only meant to bind the food together.
	* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. The Rif ([[Brachot]] 27b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:17), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) quote this differentiation. The Tur and S”A 208:2 codify this as halacha.		* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. The Rif ([[Brachot]] 27b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:17), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) quote this differentiation. The Tur and S”A 208:2 codify this as halacha.
	* Additionally, the Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that if the flour was added in order to harden the food the Bracha isn’t [[mezonot]]. Also, the Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) writes that if the flour was added as a binding agent or only in order to impart a color or smell the food isn’t [[mezonot]] because of the flour. Sh”t Avnei Nezer 38:2 writes that if one adds flour only in order to soften the food so that someone who doesn’t have teeth could eat it the Bracha is made on the other ingredients.		* Additionally, the Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that if the flour was added in order to harden the food the Bracha isn’t [[mezonot]]. Also, the Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) writes that if the flour was added as a binding agent or only in order to impart a color or smell the food isn’t [[mezonot]] because of the flour. Sh”t Avnei Nezer 38:2 writes that if one adds flour only in order to soften the food so that someone who doesn’t have teeth could eat it the Bracha is made on the other ingredients.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 23 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==		==The five grains (wheat, barley…)==
	# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara Brachot 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. S"A 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>		# The Bracha of [[Mezonot]] is only applicable to food that are made from the five grains (which will be enumerated below). The other conditions in order for a food to require [[Mezonot]] are explained below.<ref>Rav and Shmuel in Gemara [[Brachot]] 35b say that [[Mezonot]] is only made upon the five grains. S"A 208:2 codifies this as halacha.</ref>
	# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref>		# The five grains which our Rabbis designated as the fundamental grains that provide sustenance to man are wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <ref>
	* The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam (Brachot 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and HaMotzei when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]		* The Gemara Pesachim (35a) identifies the five grains which were distinguished by Chazal as חטים שעורים כוסמין ושיפון ושיבולת שועל. Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:1-3) writes that these grains are the same five which Chazal choose to be [[Mezonot]] when made in a cooked dish and [[HaMotzei]] when made into bread. Tur 208:1 and Mishna Brurah 208:2 codify this as halacha. [Halacha Brurah (Shaar HaTziyun 208:13) writes that this is accepted by all poskim.]
	* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of Brachos (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value.		* What is the definition of these grains? Veten Bracha (Halachos of Brochos by Rabbi Bodner pg 480, chapter 27) defines the five grains as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 102) writes that even though some argue that שיפון isn’t rye and שיבולת שועל isn’t oat, nonetheless, he quotes the Mekor Bracha (26:3) who establish that the generally accepted definitions of rye and oat are correct. The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, chap 8, pg 230) emphasizes this point by stating that these definitions are supported by the Rishonim and are totally accepted as halacha despite the argument of modern scholars who use methods of questionable halachic value.
	* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios are made) have a siginificant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is mezonot. </ref>		* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/759938/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Laws_and_Customs_of_Pesach Rabbi Hershel Schachter] (min 79-82) fundamentally doesn't agree that oats are considered a grain, however, he concludes that since American oats (from which Cherrios are made) have a siginificant amount of gluten in them the correct bracha is [[mezonot]]. </ref>
	# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is mezonot. <ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>		# <div id="brachaonbulgur"></div>Cooked bulgur is one of the five grains and is [[mezonot]]. <ref>Vezot Habracha (pg 105) </ref>

	==General rule==		==General rule==
	# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the Bracha Achrona is Al HaMichya. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>		# Any food which is made from flour of one of the grains and it was cooked is [[Mezonot]] and the [[Bracha Achrona]] is [[Al HaMichya]]. Even if there is a majority of other ingredients the Bracha remains [[Mezonot]]. As long as the purpose of adding flour is to fill one up, give a taste to the food, or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>
	* In Gemara Brachot 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is mezonot. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif (Brachot 26a), Rosh (Brachot 6:7), and Rambam (Brachot 3:4) and codified by Tur and S"A 208:2.		* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. (This is known the rule of Kol SheYesh Bo.) This is quoted by the Rif ([[Brachot]] 26a), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and S"A 208:2.
	* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not mezonot. Moreover, the Rashba (Brachot 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.		* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. Moreover, the Rashba ([[Brachot]] 36b s.v. Duvsha) writes that if the flour is added in order to give a taste or make the food more fit for consumption the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. This is quoted by the Bet Yosef 208:2 and codified as halacha by the Mishna Brurah 208:7.
	* Rosh (Brachot 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>		* Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that even if there is a majority of other ingredients flour is primary and the Bracha is [[Mezonot]]. Bet Yosef 208:2 proves this from the language of the Gemara. The S”A 208:2 codifies this as halacha. </ref> This is only true when the taste of the flour is recognizable. <Ref>Beiur Halacha 208:9 s.v. Mivarech says that even though the Taz holds that once flour is added the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] whether or not the taste of flour is recognizable, nonetheless, many achronim argue on the Taz. Mishna Brurah 208:49 and Halacha Brurah 208:7 conclude that the Bracha is [[Mezonot]] only if the taste of the flour is recognizable. </ref>
	# The major exception to the above rule is when the grain flour is added only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food (and not [[Mezonot]] because of the flour). <Ref>		# The major exception to the above rule is when the grain flour is added only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food (and not [[Mezonot]] because of the flour). <Ref>
	* In Gemara Brachot 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is mezonot. However, on Gemara Brachot 39a Rav Huna states that a cooked dish made out of beets and flour is HaAdama because the flour added was only meant to bind the food together.		* In Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b, Rav and Shmuel say that anything which has (flour from) the five grains is [[mezonot]]. However, on Gemara [[Brachot]] 39a Rav Huna states that a cooked dish made out of beets and flour is HaAdama because the flour added was only meant to bind the food together.
	* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not mezonot. The Rif (Brachot 27b), Rosh (Brachot 6:17), and Rambam (Brachot 3:6) quote this differentiation. The Tur and S”A 208:2 codify this as halacha.		* Tosfot 36b s.v. Kol writes that if the flour is added in order to fill one up then the food is [[Mezonot]], whereas if it’s added as a binding agent it’s not [[mezonot]]. The Rif ([[Brachot]] 27b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:17), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) quote this differentiation. The Tur and S”A 208:2 codify this as halacha.
	* Additionally, the Rosh (Brachot 6:7) writes that if the flour was added in order to harden the food the Bracha isn’t mezonot. Also, the Rambam (Brachot 3:6) writes that if the flour was added as a binding agent or only in order to impart a color or smell the food isn’t mezonot because of the flour. Sh”t Avnei Nezer 38:2 writes that if one adds flour only in order to soften the food so that someone who doesn’t have teeth could eat it the Bracha is made on the other ingredients.		* Additionally, the Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7) writes that if the flour was added in order to harden the food the Bracha isn’t [[mezonot]]. Also, the Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:6) writes that if the flour was added as a binding agent or only in order to impart a color or smell the food isn’t [[mezonot]] because of the flour. Sh”t Avnei Nezer 38:2 writes that if one adds flour only in order to soften the food so that someone who doesn’t have teeth could eat it the Bracha is made on the other ingredients.
	* Therefore, Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that if it’s used only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food. </ref>even if there’s a majority of flour the Bracha isn’t mezonot. [However, this is very uncommon.] <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:6 </ref> For an example of this, see [[#Licorice]].		* Therefore, Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that if it’s used only in order to bind, harden, soften, impart a color, or smell the Bracha is made upon the other ingredients of the food. </ref>even if there’s a majority of flour the Bracha isn’t [[mezonot]]. [However, this is very uncommon.] <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:6 </ref> For an example of this, see [[#Licorice]].

	==If one eats a grain product as a meal==		==If one eats a grain product as a meal==
	# There are two types of grain products that require mezonot. If a grain was ground up and then made into a cooked dish (Tavshil [[Mezonot]]) such as oatmeal or a baked good ([[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]]) such as cake, the appropriate Bracha would be [[Mezonot]]. However, a cooked dish requires [[Mezonot]] even if one establishes it into a meal <ref>S”A 208:2 </ref> whereas Pas HaBah Bekisnin requires [[Mezonot]] if eaten as a snack, but HaMotzei if established as a meal. See further details at [[Making a meal on Mezonot]] </ref> S”A 168:6 </ref>		# There are two types of grain products that require [[mezonot]]. If a grain was ground up and then made into a cooked dish (Tavshil [[Mezonot]]) such as oatmeal or a baked good ([[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]]) such as cake, the appropriate Bracha would be [[Mezonot]]. However, a cooked dish requires [[Mezonot]] even if one establishes it into a meal <ref>S”A 208:2 </ref> whereas [[Pas HaBah Bekisnin]] requires [[Mezonot]] if eaten as a snack, but [[HaMotzei]] if established as a meal. See further details at [[Making a meal on Mezonot]] </ref> S”A 168:6 </ref>

	==Noodles==		==Noodles==
	# Noodles and macaroni are mezonot. <Ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5</ref>		# Noodles and macaroni are [[mezonot]]. <Ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5</ref>

	==Oatmeal and farina==		==Oatmeal and farina==
	# Hot cereals made from the five grains, farina, and oatmeal have Bracha Rishona of [[Mezonot]] and Bracha Achrona of Al HaMichya (even if one makes a meal out of it) <ref>The Gemara Brachot 36b records that everyone agrees that Daysa is [[Mezonot]]. Rashi (s.v. Daysa) explains that Daysa is (a cooked dish) made from crushed up wheat. This ruling is implied from the Rif (Brachot 25b), Rosh (Brachot 6:7), and Rambam (Brachot 3:4) and codified by Tur and S"A 208:2. Therefore, The Laws of Brachos (Rabbi Forst, pg 272) and Halachos of Brachos (Rabbi Bodner, chap 27, pg 532, and Brachos handbook pg 64) rule that oatmeal and farina is [[Mezonot]] and Al HaMichya. Halachos of Brachos adds that even if one makes a meal (Koveh Seuda) out of oatmeal the bracha is still [[Mezonot]]. </ref> unless it is made with a watery consistency. <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that hot cereal which are made out of the five grains is [[Mezonot]] unless it is very thin and watery. This is also the ruling of Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 107) that oatmeal cereal is mezonot unless it's very thin and pours like a liquid (he adds that if one pushes the grain to one side of the bowl and it remains there as a clump and doesn't spread out right away it's considered a food and not a drink). </ref>		# Hot cereals made from the five grains, farina, and oatmeal have [[Bracha Rishona]] of [[Mezonot]] and [[Bracha Achrona]] of [[Al HaMichya]] (even if one makes a meal out of it) <ref>The Gemara [[Brachot]] 36b records that everyone agrees that Daysa is [[Mezonot]]. Rashi (s.v. Daysa) explains that Daysa is (a cooked dish) made from crushed up wheat. This ruling is implied from the Rif ([[Brachot]] 25b), Rosh ([[Brachot]] 6:7), and Rambam ([[Brachot]] 3:4) and codified by Tur and S"A 208:2. Therefore, The Laws of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Forst, pg 272) and Halachos of [[Brachos]] (Rabbi Bodner, chap 27, pg 532, and [[Brachos]] handbook pg 64) rule that oatmeal and farina is [[Mezonot]] and [[Al HaMichya]]. Halachos of [[Brachos]] adds that even if one makes a meal (Koveh Seuda) out of oatmeal the bracha is still [[Mezonot]]. </ref> unless it is made with a watery consistency. <ref>Halacha Brurah 208:5 rules that hot cereal which are made out of the five grains is [[Mezonot]] unless it is very thin and watery. This is also the ruling of Vezot HaBracha (chap 12, pg 107) that oatmeal cereal is [[mezonot]] unless it's very thin and pours like a liquid (he adds that if one pushes the grain to one side of the bowl and it remains there as a clump and doesn't spread out right away it's considered a food and not a drink). </ref>

	==Licorice==		==Licorice==
	# If the grain is mixed into the food in order to bind the ingredients together the Bracha is not [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>S”A 208:3 </ref>		# If the grain is mixed into the food in order to bind the ingredients together the Bracha is not [[Mezonot]]. <Ref>S”A 208:3 </ref>
	# Licorice is Shehakol because even though it contains flour, the flour is only used as a binding agent. <Ref>Vezot HaBracha (pg 108, chapter 12), [http://www.ou.org/torah/tt/5759/eikev59/specialfeatures.htm An article on OU.org]. Rav Yisrael Belsky in Shulchan HaLevi (3:14, p. 37) writes that licorice is Shehakol since the flour in only added for texture. </ref>		# Licorice is [[Shehakol]] because even though it contains flour, the flour is only used as a binding agent. <Ref>Vezot HaBracha (pg 108, chapter 12), [http://www.ou.org/torah/tt/5759/eikev59/specialfeatures.htm An article on OU.org]. Rav Yisrael Belsky in Shulchan HaLevi (3:14, p. 37) writes that licorice is [[Shehakol]] since the flour in only added for texture. </ref>
	==Raw Grains==		==Raw Grains==
	For the bracha on raw, roasted, and puffed grains, see the [[Raw or roasted grain]] page. A common example of this category is granola. See that page for details.		For the bracha on raw, roasted, and puffed grains, see the [[Raw or roasted grain]] page. A common example of this category is granola. See that page for details.
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>
			[[Category:Brachot]]