16,374
edits
Broken Utensils: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Broken vessels
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# If a broken vessel is in a place where it could cause danger such as if glass broke on the table or in an area that people walk, it’s permissible to move the pieces to prevent danger. <Ref>Rama 308:6 </ref> | # If a broken vessel is in a place where it could cause danger such as if glass broke on the table or in an area that people walk, it’s permissible to move the pieces to prevent danger. <Ref>Rama 308:6 </ref> | ||
## A needle that was in a place that could injure someone is permissible to be moved. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:47 </ref> | ## A needle that was in a place that could injure someone is permissible to be moved. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:47 </ref> | ||
# If a vessel broke before [[Shabbat]] and one threw it in the garbage before [[Shabbat]], it’s considered [[Muktzeh Machmat Gufo]]. <Ref> | # If a vessel broke before [[Shabbat]] and one threw it in the garbage before [[Shabbat]], it’s considered [[Muktzeh Machmat Gufo]].<Ref>Shulchan Aruch 308:7 </ref> However if one threw out a vessel on [[Shabbat]] it doesn’t become [[Muktzeh]]. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:32 </ref> | ||
# If one threw out a perfectly good vessel it’s not considered [[Muktzeh]]. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:51 </ref> | # If one threw out a perfectly good vessel it’s not considered [[Muktzeh]]. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:51 </ref> | ||
# The door of a vessel which broke off the vessel isn’t [[Muktzeh]] | # The door of a vessel which broke off the vessel isn’t [[Muktzeh]] whether it broke before Shabbat or on Shabbat<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 308:8 </ref> even if it isn't useful for anything.<ref>Mishna Brurah 308:35. | ||
* Why are doors of kelim that break off not muktzeh? Tosfot 122b s.v. adaraba explains that it useful to be reused when reattached. Ran 122b s.v. adaraba agrees. Mishna Brurah 308:35 codifies this. However, Shitah Lner 122b s.v. vaf and Meiri 122b s.v. amar imply otherwise; it isn’t muktzeh since it is currently useful for its original purpose of covering utensils. Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 15 fnt. 235 quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach that we should be strict for the Meiri, Ri Mlunil and Ran.</ref> | |||
# Doors of a house or something else attached to the ground that fell off on Shabbat are muktzeh<Ref>Mishna Shabbat 122b, Mishna Brurah 308:35</ref> even if they are fashioned to be a nice utensil since they were designated to be used as a door while attached.<ref> | |||
* Are doors of houses considered kelim? Rashi Shabbat 122b s.v. vaf explained that it isn’t a kli. Meiri 122b s.v. amar and Ritva 122b s.v. veynam agree. Rambam Shabbat 25:6 writes that it is a kli but still muktzeh since it isn’t prepared to be moved. Mishna Brurah 308:42 echoes the Rambam. | |||
* Biur Halacha 308:10 s.v. ein explains that according to the Rambam a door is a kli but it is muktzeh since it isn't meant to be used. However, Rashi who explains that it isn't a kli if this door was fashioned to be a kli in advance then if it fell off it wouldn't be muktzeh. Chazon Ish 46:4 argues that there’s no difference between Rashi and Rambam, both hold it isn’t a kli since it isn't designated to be moved. They would both be strict on a door that fell off even if it was fashioned. See Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Magen Avraham 308:19 who also seems to understand the Rambam that it isn’t really a kli.</ref> | |||
# A broken needle that lost it’s point (or it’s hole) is [[Muktzeh Machmat Gufo]] <ref> S”A 308:11 </ref> | # A broken needle that lost it’s point (or it’s hole) is [[Muktzeh Machmat Gufo]] <ref> S”A 308:11 </ref> | ||
# Clothing that ripped isn’t [[Muktzeh]] if the pieces are larger than 3 [[Tefachim]] by 3 [[Tefachim]]. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:52 </ref> | # Clothing that ripped isn’t [[Muktzeh]] if the pieces are larger than 3 [[Tefachim]] by 3 [[Tefachim]]. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:52 </ref> | ||
